Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AB76EA43 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14825 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2013 16:41:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 14799 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2013 16:41:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 14780 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jan 2013 16:41:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:41:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fboulegue@me.com designates 17.172.220.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.172.220.240] (HELO st11p02mm-asmtp005.mac.com) (17.172.220.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:41:00 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_x2uN6PhhUJkQd0mP+vhSOg)" Received: from [10.0.1.16] (ip-88-153-116-154.unitymediagroup.de [88.153.116.154]) by st11p02mm-asmtp005.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Jan 3 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0MHG00MWF6BJWN90@st11p02mm-asmtp005.mac.com> for dev@cordova.apache.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:40:34 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-01-30_06:2013-01-30,2013-01-30,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1212290000 definitions=main-1301300105 From: fabian boulegue Message-id: <8CEDA871-312A-4F3D-ADDE-BB981B332578@me.com> Subject: Re: ship 2.4 monday Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:40:34 +0100 References: <5B23B58A-EA30-42C3-8003-5CA4A9358491@me.com> To: dev@cordova.apache.org In-reply-to: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Boundary_(ID_x2uN6PhhUJkQd0mP+vhSOg) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hey Andrew also my issues isnt fixed, also dont see the changes on the inAppBrowser here.... Fabian Am Jan 30, 2013 um 4:23 PM schrieb Andrew Grieve : > Okay, tagged JS, iOS, Android. > > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2-src.zip > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-js.zip > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-ios.zip > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-android.zip > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:35 PM, fabian boulegue wrote: > >> Agree >> >> _____________________ >> Fabian Boulegue >> tea inc. >> CEO - Founder >> Meierbrede 9 >> 33100 Paderborn >> >> Mobile >> >> Am 29.01.2013 um 23:43 schrieb Shazron : >> >>> Ah I get it now (Andrew's list of significant iOS commits) I suppose we >>> could internally tag an rc2 (not public release) and test the heck out of >>> it. Those iOS changes are critical bug fixes since rc1. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Grieve >> wrote: >>> >>>> Okay, that wasn't entirely clear... >>>> >>>> I think we'd get pretty far by just tagging & testing iOS & Android, >> since >>>> most of the changes since rc1 relate to those two platforms. Agree? >>>> >>>> Given that we don't test before cutting an rc1, I think we should >> generally >>>> expect that we'll need to do an rc2 before shipping a release. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >>>> >>>>> Andrew: sounds great. >>>>> >>>>> I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those >>>>> commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk >>>>> >>>>> (Hopefully with a better outcome.---^) >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working off >>>> the >>>>>>> same version >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a >>>>> small >>>>>>>> group...? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _____________________ >>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue >>>>>>>> tea inc. >>>>>>>> CEO - Founder >>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9 >>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mobile >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various >>>>> committers in >>>>>>>>> transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on >>>>>>>> Monday? >>>>>>>>>> People interested in testing could just work off the source. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Steve >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Changes of note: >>>>>>>>>>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6. >>>>>>>>>>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin >>>>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist >>>>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant >>>> an >>>>>>> rc2. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the >>>>> iOS >>>>>>>>>>> repo >>>>>>>>>>>> recently (at least more than I have). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested >>>>> here, >>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>> the known issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>> So we would stay on time. >>>>>>>>>>>>> _____________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue >>>>>>>>>>>>> tea inc. >>>>>>>>>>>>> CEO - Founder >>>>>>>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9 >>>>>>>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj : >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before >>>>>>>>>>> releasing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this >>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warrant >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an rc2. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless >>>>> contributors >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over >>>>>>>>>>> from, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent! >>>> >> --Boundary_(ID_x2uN6PhhUJkQd0mP+vhSOg)--