cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: too long to package a release?
Date Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:39:39 GMT
Yay for grannies using G+!  (mine does, too, which is great, and far less
annoying than her FB game invites!)


On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:

> I was the one who didn't want to sign up for G+ :)
>
> Now it's a moot point as my gramma uses it and so, by proxy, I am required
> to as well :P
>
> On 1/15/13 6:22 AM, "Michal Mocny" <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> >Thanks for coordinating schedules Brain.  Im quite glad to be on EST :)
> >
> >We should also establish a medium: Google hangouts were not well received
> >by everyone last year, (not everyone had a G+ account), but I cannot think
> >of anything that is nearly as convenient.  Suggestions?
> >
> >-Michal
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Becky Gibson
> ><gibson.becky@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Am I correct in assuming US pacific time zone?
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >> On Jan 15, 2013, at 4:36 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Works for me, however, to accommodate EU community we must to consider
> >> > times unholy. This is Apache Way from what I understand.
> >> >
> >> > I created a form to help us pick a time to talk.
> >> >
> >> > http://goo.gl/h9d1a
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> Okay gentlemen, I think there have been countless good points made
> >>from
> >> all
> >> >> parties, but also some bike-shedding.
> >> >>
> >> >> Perhaps it is time to schedule some face-time to better articulate
> >>some
> >> of
> >> >> the finer points, and to help come to some consensus?
> >> >>
> >> >> -Michal
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Sorry if this got asked before, but does a feature branch get
> >>deleted
> >> >>> after it is merged? Just wondering about branch clutter over a
long
> >> period,
> >> >>> or if this is just the same as a topic branch using today's
> >>committer
> >> >>> workflow.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 1/14/2013 5:34 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> You work on a Feature branch. It gets rolled into Dev as needed
so
> >> >>>> others can merge / collaborate on said feature. When it feels
right
> >> >>>> instead of merging a large set of potentially breaking commits
to
> >> >>>> Unstable the dev working on said feature just merges that feature.
> >> >>>> This would require more responsibility for the committer to
keep
> >>track
> >> >>>> of their feature branches which I could see as being more overhead.
> >> >>>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message