cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian>
Subject Re: Review of Core Platforms
Date Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:22:38 GMT
Ok. So I removed 'sunrise', updated the definition text to include
what was discussed here, and moved Bada to sunset.

I noticed Windows 8 made its way into our core platforms without any
mention in this thread. I have no objection to this, though I'm not
sure it implements the entirety of the definition we describe.

On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Anis KADRI <> wrote:
> +1 for bada removal from core platforms. Samsung is not even working on it
> anymore. "We're focused on Tizen" is what their marketing people told me
> last time I asked them about it.
> I think we should ship only platforms that matter (i.e platforms that
> appear on Analyst's market share numbers) and document how to build the
> others from source (because people do use them even if they're not
> necessarily loud about it).
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Filip Maj <> wrote:
>> >Think its still good to make this distinction even though our scope is
>> >going to drastically reduce (in a sense). The benefit of these labels
>> >is to indicate how much involvement developers using Cordova can
>> >expect the Cordova platform to maintain.
>> >
>> >Core platforms target an operating system, with devices in
>> >circulation, providing:
>> >
>> >- A standard low level bridge API and utilities.
>> >- Standard set of low level CLI tools
>> >- Embeddable (if possible)
>> >- InAppBrowser and other browser-ish shims like alerts, etc.
>> >- [what else?]
>> A native plugin API?

View raw message