Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-17932-apmail-cordova-dev-archive=cordova.apache.org@cordova.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70BA1E4D3
	for <apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon,  3 Dec 2012 19:09:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 56540 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2012 19:09:37 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org
Received: (qmail 56489 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2012 19:09:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@cordova.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cordova.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.cordova.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org
Received: (qmail 56481 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2012 19:09:37 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:09:37 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of timkim85@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.54 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.216.54] (HELO mail-qa0-f54.google.com) (209.85.216.54)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:09:30 +0000
Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j15so31439qaq.6
        for <dev@cordova.apache.org>; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 11:09:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=nJXe4CzM4/fdzrATuB/+38OD/7b2WTfwqU6n9j1sm8M=;
        b=ENBFK2rBDaJKC0FT2k9x9ngXILlXHN+Crn/pN21reV0Qo+3q9EYF2D86XhP98fE1vf
         O79lHIR9pMFeCr+Wtcq3WRA81TKMMD8vXfP6HDvTz4ObuAduhL8M/7/P3HLNJwGiEU4P
         UBKvnaMTyLU37y0203tXP6bgfVE7OgDFVYkeU3b3h4qIvjB0SYJbW9BgyyBSGyeBmCEC
         0pP48B1THq7DgwPfpXWe7JPX05vJkQIRs48emsEy4S1skTQKPSXJxpwnby8DZijOfZFK
         ZHZHFOZ6HiKwxtUxPyOlpQqPKDaw8iD4kBUwS0CeQfhUBqKjwj52GpNuykfepcWC9RL1
         4SJg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.187.198 with SMTP id cx6mr18851639qab.56.1354561749366;
 Mon, 03 Dec 2012 11:09:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.129.166 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 11:09:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <957F1ECDA90E004B8DBDE23CFC94E3A33A5B41E0@XMB103ECNC.rim.net>
References: 
 <CAESi+4-_CX4DCfmtu4ZMFNk2FrBtvM4e=YABhz4Mmq=kmFcioA@mail.gmail.com>
	<957F1ECDA90E004B8DBDE23CFC94E3A33A5B3B46@XMB103ECNC.rim.net>
	<CACuXHJMXKoxQ8HrsGNWN-J4DjzBFnDuU9LoKAVnawSc4oRsjpA@mail.gmail.com>
	<957F1ECDA90E004B8DBDE23CFC94E3A33A5B41E0@XMB103ECNC.rim.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 11:09:09 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CACuXHJN0WmiqG42dwf3iaR49WyqVnt7Y+DM+302XMf54Sq1azQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING: Updated BlackBerry 10 SDK
From: Tim Kim <timkim85@gmail.com>
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b397dd491e5b7e104cff77b97
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--485b397dd491e5b7e104cff77b97
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Oh sorry, I thought you were talking about something else. My mistake!


On 3 December 2012 10:42, Josh Soref <jsoref@rim.com> wrote:

> Tim Kim wrote:
> > Is it?
> > I keep seeing questions being popped up about people looking for
> webworks.js
> > even if they developing for bb5-7/playbook.
> > Usually they are trying it in ripple and errors out when it can't find
> it so it leads to some confusion.
>
> I wrote:
> |          <!-- Don't worry about js/webworks.js if you're aren't
> developing for bb10 -->
>
> Here the comment says "js/webworks.js"
>
> | -        <script type="text/javascript" src="js/webworks.js"></script>
>
> Here the code used to say "js/webworks.js", at which point the code and
> comment agreed.
>
> | +        <script type="text/javascript"
> src="local:///chrome/webworks.js"></script>
>
> This change caused the comment to no longer be in sync with the code, as
> it now says "local:///chrome/webworks.js". Anyone looking for
> "js/webworks.js" in the code won't find it.
>
> This is roughly a reminder to people "please don't forget to update
> comments when you change nearby lines of code", this applies both to
> comments which are visible in diff -U3 and in comments which aren't visible
> in diff -U3, although from my perspective it should have been spotted by a
> reviewer since it was visible in this case....
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>



-- 
Timothy Kim

--485b397dd491e5b7e104cff77b97--