Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fil@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.78 as permitted sender)
From: Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com>
To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:12:53 -0700
Subject: Re: 2.2.0 tagging?
Thread-Topic: 2.2.0 tagging?
Thread-Index: Ac24hm1dNM3hvmwNRv6fiZJoGSyT2A==
Message-ID: <CCB85002.10A42%fil@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMSbhBgH5Wdop7TWY-TDPZ_qhfZqV1+Uivca4NCNS-sCGwLk_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Nice work Steve!

On 11/1/12 4:08 PM, "Steven Gill" <stevengill97@gmail.com> wrote:

>http://people.apache.org/~steven/ has 2.2.0 on it.
>
>Seeing how there is a strong lazy consensus on shipping this, I was going
>to post it to http://www.apache.org/dist/cordova but lack the permissions.
>Our last release was under incubator and I don't think we should put it
>there.
>
>I believe once Brian gets LDAP access, he can add all of us on the pmc and
>then I should have proper access.
>
>Also PhoneGap (*http://phonegap.com/blog/2012/11/01/phonegap-220/*)
>
>-Steve
>
>On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tested on iOS 6.0, passes all mobile-spec tests. Can't test iOS 4.3
>>since
>> don't have access to 4.3 device. I suppose I can try the Simulator in
>> Leopard or something (ugh), but that's too much trouble and the
>>Simulator
>> doesn't pass all tests anyway.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > iOS 2.2.0 is tagged.
>> > mobile-spec all tests passed under iOS 5.1.1. I couldn't test under
>>6.0
>> > since I bricked my 3GS trying to downgrade to 4.3, and the iOS 6
>>iPad3 is
>> > in the office. Of course, I still can't test under iOS 4.3 yet
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> >
>> >> Micheal tagged it.  GO GO GO!
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > I could do it - I just don't know the status of the other platforms
>> >> > whether they have any js changes. Wish this was more of a checklist
>> >> > somewhere (jira?)
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Marcel Kinard
>><cmarcelk@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> Today is the day to start tagging 2.2.0, right?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Who is going to start it by tagging the js?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -- Marcel Kinard
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 10/30/2012 10:07 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> There's nothing outstanding that I'm aware of for iOS / Android.
>> This
>> >> >>> release is going to be solid!
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> iOS issues all resolved or punted to 2.3.0.
>> >> >>>> Can the js be tagged?
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Hey
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> So what are we waiting on for the 2.2.0 release?  When should
>>we
>> >> >>>>> expect the JS to be tagged so we can start tagging?
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Joe
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>