Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0CF5D5FE for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31777 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 16:38:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 31674 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 16:38:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 31647 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2012 16:38:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:38:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fil@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.31 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.31] (HELO exprod6og113.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:38:35 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob113.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUJKldZA5fRkaTYHCwry0JKRG8ePT6Ax1@postini.com; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:38:14 PDT Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id qA1GZR1v026271 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nahub02.corp.adobe.com (nahub02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.98]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id qA1GcCNc002297 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nahub02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.98]) with mapi; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:38:12 -0700 From: Filip Maj To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:38:09 -0700 Subject: Re: 2.2.0 tagging? Thread-Topic: 2.2.0 tagging? Thread-Index: Ac24T0iRtAH6mvRHRQ6sh9nL9Trtag== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Great idea Joe. We should integrate with the ci efforts underway as well On 11/1/12 9:01 AM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: >The only problem I have with these changes is that we don't have solid >tests against this. Our jUnit tests are in a semi-broken state at the >moment. We should probably spend the next release going through our >Java API and deciding what to support, and what we can toss by the >wayside. > >That being said, this should be supported Java API, since it's an >extension of the inherited method. I'm OK with this in this release, >but we need to get tests in place for this stuff again. > >Joe > >On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Simon MacDonald > wrote: >> Okay, I really hope nobody minds but I just bumped the tag up to my >>commit. >> Minor, minor change. I don't expect any issues to pop up from it and >>I've >> tested it on 2.2, 2.3, 4.0 and 4.1. >> >>=20 >>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=3Dincubator-cordova-android.git= ;a >>=3Dcommit;h=3Dd9db845b435d7b614e20ed5a3065be124a5842f5 >> >> Simon Mac Donald >> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Simon MacDonald >> wrote: >> >>> No, this is purely a Java code change. >>> >>> Simon Mac Donald >>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Jesse MacFadyen >>>wrote: >>> >>>> Will Cordova-js need to be re-tagged? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Jesse >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2012-11-01, at 7:11 AM, Simon MacDonald >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Guys, is it too late to get one more bug fix in on Android? CB-1795 >>>>was >>>> > raised over night and it shows a regression from 2.1.0 where native >>>> options >>>> > menus are concerned on Android. There is a fairly simple work around >>>> where >>>> > you override onPrepareOptionsMenu but I do so hate to regress. >>>> > >>>> > I'm going to check the fix in shortly once I can do a bit more >>>>testing. >>>> > Basically I change return false to return true. >>>> > >>>> > Simon Mac Donald >>>> > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Jesse MacFadyen < >>>> purplecabbage@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Wait on docs until I finish some windows8 stuff, please. >>>> >> >>>> >> Cheers, >>>> >> Jesse >>>> >> >>>> >> Sent from my iPhone5 >>>> >> >>>> >> On 2012-11-01, at 6:22 AM, Marcel Kinard >>>>wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> Almost there! Looks like we are missing only tizen and docs. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Tim, looks like you updated www/ for bb, so CB-1774 should be >>>>closed? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> -- Marcel Kinard >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On 10/31/2012 1:36 PM, Michael Brooks wrote: >>>> >>>> Okay guys, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I've went ahead and created the JIRA issue (CB-1760 [1]) to >>>>track the >>>> >> 2.2.0 >>>> >>>> release process. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I've also went ahead and tagged cordova-js and the hello-world >>>>app. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Happy tagging! >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1760 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Marcel Kinard >>>> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Today is the day to start tagging 2.2.0, right? >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Who is going to start it by tagging the js? >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> -- Marcel Kinard >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> On 10/30/2012 10:07 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>> There's nothing outstanding that I'm aware of for iOS / >>>>Android. >>>> This >>>> >>>>>> release is going to be solid! >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Shazron >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> iOS issues all resolved or punted to 2.3.0. >>>> >>>>>>> Can the js be tagged? >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Joe Bowser >>>> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> Hey >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> So what are we waiting on for the 2.2.0 release? When >>>>should we >>>> >>>>>>>> expect the JS to be tagged so we can start tagging? >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> Joe >>>> >> >>>> >>> >>>