cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: [Android] Feedback requested on our camera
Date Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:05:12 GMT
Yep, got it working by adding that line to the manifest. My impression is
the same as Simon just said. The stock Camera on 4.2 is really nice, so
taking this away is a bit sad. I understand the motivation behind wanting
this when other stock cameras are buggy though, and there are certainly
many apps out there that have their own cameras in them. So... if we could
make this a plugin, apps that want a custom camera could pull it in and
tweak it to their needs, but I don't think it's the right long-term play.


On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Simon MacDonald
<simon.macdonald@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hey Joe,
>
> After delving into this problem for quite some time I have come back around
> and I believe this new "foreground" camera should end up being a plugin
> instead of a core part of the API. We really shouldn't be in the business
> of implementing a Camera app for end users and there is no way we are going
> to make them all happy. I believe we are just opening ourselves up to
> more/different problems by continuing on this route.
>
> Sorry to flip, flop on this issue.
>
> Simon Mac Donald
> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey
> >
> > I'm going to resurrect this thread. What do people think of our
> > pre-built camera so far? I still have updated on this branch here:
> >
> > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/tree/camera
> >
> > It'd be good to get more feedback before continuing down this road.
> > The downside so far is having to pass around assets.  I wish there was
> > a way around this.  Also, feedback on the UI elements would also help.
> >
> > There's still work to be done, but should we hav this as a built-in
> > option for 2.3.0, or should we delay to 2.4.0?  It'd be good to get
> > feedback on this now before we continue to move with this.
> >
> > Joe
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message