Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A79FDD4A3 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32580 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2012 17:57:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 32550 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2012 17:57:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 32540 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2012 17:57:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:57:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fil@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.25] (HELO exprod6og110.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:57:04 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob110.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUGsq2lvDB/gAwPINCBAnUTKXpxEjcUod@postini.com; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 10:56:44 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q92Hs15I029399 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q92HuMXL004811 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:56:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.99]) with mapi; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:56:22 -0700 From: Filip Maj To: "callback-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:56:20 -0700 Subject: Re: plugin analysis Thread-Topic: plugin analysis Thread-Index: Ac2gxzucNrIHLybrRbWwjuEiUoO4dg== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 >From the PhoneGap Build team guys (Andrew Lunny et al), this may be relevant to the search, Mike. http://community.phonegap.com/nitobi/topics/_phonegap_build_future_plugin_s upport On 10/1/12 1:59 PM, "Mike Reinstein" wrote: >hey gang, > >i've gone through all of the plugins in >https://github.com/phonegap/phonegap-plugins and put together a basic >comparison grid to provide some visibility: > >https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=3D0Al813Y70ZNWbdC0zRFduOEY2M0t= jZ >WYxOVVUbmVFRGc > >Can anyone help with this? Tracking 92 plugins X 6 platforms is more than >I >can handle on my own. :) Things that could be improved upon: > > - contributors for each plugin are unknown > - popularity of plugins is unclear because the git stars is for the > whole repo, not individual plugins > - last updated is incomplete, and a rough estimate > - maybe there are other plugins not listed in phonegap-plugins repo >that > should be added to this list > - probably should link to each project > - the "no" answer in each cell should be changed. it's not clear if a > plugin is missing because its only relevant for a given platform, >(e.g., > mapkit plugin doesnt make sense for Qt platform) or because it hasnt >been > implemented > > >This is publicly editable to make collaboration easy. Goes without saying >but if you decide to contribute to this please dont trash/abuse it. :) > >Any feedback would be really helpful on this. thanks! > >-Mike