Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84CBCDF72 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94291 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2012 16:00:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94273 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2012 16:00:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94256 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2012 16:00:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:00:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of anis.kadri@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.175] (HELO mail-ye0-f175.google.com) (209.85.213.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:00:45 +0000 Received: by mail-ye0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m2so350141yen.6 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:00:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=O/LIIbGlfvwsGxxv7ODnKSfTRtIETv8yiaRIQw0/INA=; b=Wp0lqScsJaXaNl2yV/aYiHlz9+CGD56KUvcAOb3b8hQDi8gPWx93BlPjaeYSCtdSxx 1MWa5/rHwtcWvt0X8wcm7QHTWPNLu00gb6HQ4kYs5pdryNyaL/HtNwOCrp6Co2W06x2y LZzl0dzYTFqaEW+6gD1M4R88PzGtgGA64RqL8CJV3CV8tWlmQoogl1iOJf3cjgaeQ/my ZxhrmeOJd0yvWQezjAycZ7v5Faj+E0o+IZSmEfPmgRlaM0LrFbUK8LV32Cnkczasjb76 pTCxzXD9UVSgl69tyzmfPVmEuvfeYddJi8Kfuv1ZnZVQD1DpoaSRGfBKA+CHJ+4jogER FmOQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.191.69 with SMTP id f45mr21722299yhn.8.1350576024352; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:00:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.144.168 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:00:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:00:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cordova/debug vs. cordova/emulate From: Anis KADRI To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3040eb5e2c766104cc577c5b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3040eb5e2c766104cc577c5b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No, it's not. I just didn't know you had already created one. I closed the issue. On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote= : > :) I guess my suggestion to move further discussion to > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1668 is a no. Anis - is the bug > you created any different? Do you want to make it about deprecating the o= ld > scripts? > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > > > Totally in favor of these changes! > > > > How would we go about documenting these changes? Just drop them in for > > 2.3? Blog post? Thoughts? > Cordova docs + blog post > > > > On 10/17/12 3:14 PM, "Anis KADRI" wrote: > > > > >On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Andrew Grieve > > >wrote: > > > > > >> I don't think we should change them for 2.2, and instead take some > time > > >>for > > >> 2.3 to get them exactly how we want them, and consist across > platforms. > > >> > > > > > >Agreed > > > > > > > > >> > > >> I think keeping the existing scrips as-is for a deprecation period > would > > >> cause more confusion than good. > > > > > > > > >I believe we can show a warning message during the deprecation period = so > > >that people can get used to the new commands. > > > > > >I created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1670 > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Anis KADRI > > >>wrote: > > >> > > >> > Yes, I think so. > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Dully noted for the cli :) > > >> > > > > >> > > I'll have the cli reflect the command changes as well. > > >> > > > > >> > > Should there be any level of "deprecation" for this? I.e. Keep t= he > > >>old > > >> > > scripts around for 2.2 and then remove/rename as necessary > > >>completely > > >> for > > >> > > 2.3? > > >> > > > > >> > > On 10/16/12 11:39 AM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > >ya 2.3 for sure --- I imagine this will bust up cordova-cli a > > >>little > > >> > > > > > >> > > >On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Anis KADRI < > anis.kadri@gmail.com > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Yes I like that much better. Should we target those changes f= or > > >>2.2 > > >> or > > >> > > >>2.3 > > >> > > >> ? I am thinking 2.3. It will give us sometime to update the > docs > > >> etc=C5=A0 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Brian LeRoux > > >>wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> > ./cordova/BOOM is what you want. Why is it called like tha= t > > >>and > > >> why > > >> > > >>>there > > >> > > >>> > is no such thing on iOS ? I don't know=C5=A0 > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> Heh. I did that as a joke for my 'Steve Jobs' demo. BOOM > there's > > >> your > > >> > > >>>app. > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > I am not a fan of "debug" to run on a device though. Can > there > > >> be a > > >> > > >>> better > > >> > > >>> > word ? > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> cordova/deploy? > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > --20cf3040eb5e2c766104cc577c5b--