Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of braden@google.com designates
 209.85.223.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: braden@google.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABiQX1UT=s01bncYAiqA8VV=a4XEfoyA1ghgV4jUsVj3iB5DLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CACAoQH3HH3+GAfpmznnb7rzLjtPRBwQH3fSf60mQeZsE938eFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABiQX1UT=s01bncYAiqA8VV=a4XEfoyA1ghgV4jUsVj3iB5DLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:28:55 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAMk5LLkLTQ2_LokmJzgDL=bTqu+c=th6Ap+0UqYzn=N9uMKEkg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: sweet.js and TypeScript
From: Braden Shepherdson <braden@chromium.org>
To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93405f361e35b04cca6acba

--14dae93405f361e35b04cca6acba
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>From my indirect knowledge of TypeScript, I think one of its major points
is that it's a strict superset of JS. That means that normal JS is valid
TypeScript, so it can be used with other libraries and tools that are plain
JS.


On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>wrote=
:

> Sounds like a fun discussion :)
>
> There are two things about sweet.js that make me iffy about it:
> 1. Looks like it might make our code look not like JS, and contributors
> would need to learn a new language to figure out what's going on
> 2. It might make it easier to write bloated code
>
> I think if we really wanted something like sweet.js, something like
> Traceur<http://code.google.com/p/traceur-compiler/wiki/LanguageFeatures
> >might
> be a better place to start.
>
> I'm well accustomed to writing typed JS from my past experience with
> Closure Compiler. I haven't looked enough at TypeScript yet to know which
> tool might give better type checking, but if people are interested in typ=
e
> checking, it'd be worth considering Closure Compiler as well.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Patrick Mueller <pmuellr@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > There was some chit-chat on Twitter this weekend about using the sweet.=
js
> > [1] macro processor in Cordova.  Somehow.  Not quite sure how.  Also, a
> - I
> > believe trolling - mention of using TypeScript [2].  Somehow.
> >
> > I'd be interested in hearing more about either.
> >
> > w/r/t TypeScript - note that Isaac Schlueter has mentioned using
> TypeScript
> > with node.js [3]:
> >
> >     "It=92d be a great idea to write up a TypeScript header file
> >     for the API surface in Node. Then, we could automatically
> >     test for API deviations, validate and flesh out our
> >     documentation, etc. Static typing does confer some very
> >     relevant value."
> >
> > I spent a frustrating couple of hours writing code with TypeScript -
> didn't
> > come away impressed; but as an interface definition language - maybe. N=
ot
> > sure what the reflective capabilities are there in terms of the output
> tho.
> >
> > [1] http://sweetjs.org/
> > [2] http://www.typescriptlang.org/
> > [3] http://blog.izs.me/post/32697104162/thoughts-on-typescript
> >
> > --
> > Patrick Mueller
> > http://muellerware.org
> >
>

--14dae93405f361e35b04cca6acba--