Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91931DDD9 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 18:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88841 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2012 18:22:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88810 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2012 18:22:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88802 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2012 18:22:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:22:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mmocny@google.com designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:22:50 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id ro12so4996841pbb.6 for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 11:22:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-system-of-record; bh=ATLqZaAWts+aB/gHqvDVtUf+VKf8qPUWc5E1pbIsBRU=; b=fbwOWc7Vlk44Te/PV+tOQKMsBX6hMUo2HipG6IHpbysqAL51+5jKIjx7//2Bi8EYj9 cJ820dZlAJKD9dgQyHvkCSl2vgjz1vP1QVvEw2oodiqpA1+ZGT09yW0gqikVQg8Fs/WG q3zsWjDepUPzkYFvucX0EGQIImejT606ObZGS/UHyjv3xFm5CNTOlcBXTRKWSwXY9+YW cQoAPbCphS1Sw8jlTkE0+kxz8WzniWdcosnmeqw/0FRQiQ/yKpWHCjkg3OJzAm71Nhdt m0p8nO484DpHth+dQsDemBw0ImaoxIMsrSYUzqKvSDy16TsCPET0fRNC/2ranimL3adq 6g0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=ATLqZaAWts+aB/gHqvDVtUf+VKf8qPUWc5E1pbIsBRU=; b=bIDf3qZDW/VLh+lvR5pzq7o1WPF/9U5PMRJyTP+fsc1phvoq6F5k/cwHIiQmYnH2nv 3jZo2ZhJyQ8lhXHWYQj0owTuQBYYPa1DzO66Ima5qHd6PIhHI01fU20QUNtQg3qfjYYT rAbevDDG7WOhK3DfCTwNgtq3o6x6CRTgKMFdMpCOiYHbwcoQ1q2FW/Xxxa2ThcBGDq7O L+U7Pu6prBLxOGux/e0dRYccdHXHB28UOEi0tJtWJX8pDuHHihPuZ9oCNSxRnLMdES6R TZp+uy5qmROoIruTN8o9qV3evZHeehmhqrfGXoLnm1kIvvFKcwGrFwBUReQXrwTyFUht kvEw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.83.9 with SMTP id m9mr54645678pay.22.1349806948102; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 11:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mmocny@google.com Received: by 10.68.32.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 11:22:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <-4384153888603358921@unknownmsgid> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 14:22:27 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2PQ5iNCgfOM_Rpgq1fLfXzQQzW8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Discuss] Nomination of VP for Cordova From: Michal Mocny To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042ef517a8339904cba46bf0 X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnUkzfFN/Ha+MM5aq2NzBWRRdLX8rqSRTXytjsGKmWYjbb7qn7scHs79TZC6rcqaQQ1lLR9v93tCA6LMV2WT8hqcYp3fo4m85jPSOKXd51pLxC91UIcJ67EOcQoTXrycHsJCYvlUzWuXiX1pQXXa1zq+B1NZP9+pMbF4cjHiGlz/c1FtHPef8APjtcyLV2An38w46hW7SZDOMzo+F7QxVnnuOiUNQ== --f46d042ef517a8339904cba46bf0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 I agree Brian LeRoux On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Shazron wrote: > yup, Brian LeRoux > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Michael Brooks > wrote: > > +1 Brian LeRoux > > > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj wrote: > > > >> +1 punishing Brian LeRoux / +1 Brian as VP > >> > >> On 10/9/12 10:39 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" wrote: > >> > >> >I agree! > >> >Or if you want a vote: > >> >+1 to Brian Leroux as VP > >> > > >> >Cheers, > >> > Jesse > >> > > >> >Sent from my iPhone6 > >> > > >> >On 2012-10-09, at 10:31 AM, Steven Gill > wrote: > >> > > >> >> I believe we are allowed to come to a lazy consensus if no one has > >> >>issues > >> >> with Brian becoming VP. We can save time by not having to vote and > >> >>moving > >> >> the graduation process forward. > >> >> > >> >> Thoughts? > >> >> > >> >> -Steve > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon MacDonald > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> I can't think of anyone who deserves the punishment, I mean reward, > of > >> >>> being VP more than Brian LeRoux. > >> >>> > >> >>> Simon Mac Donald > >> >>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jesse MacFadyen > >> >>> >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> Yes, Joe is correct. This list is full of non-voting plus ones. > >> >>>> Suggestion: > >> >>>> If you agree with an idea, use the term 'I agree' ( the new +1 ) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Cheers, > >> >>>> Jesse > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Sent from my iPhone6 > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On 2012-10-09, at 9:25 AM, Joe Bowser wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> I don't think we officially voted yet as per Apache. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Michael Brooks < > >> >>> michael@michaelbrooks.ca> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>> Thank you for the votes. It's an honour to be considered for > Apache > >> >>>>>> Cordova's VP role. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> However, Brian holds the vast majority of votes and has accepted > the > >> >>>> role. > >> >>>>>> During incubation, he's been the interface between the Board and > the > >> >>>>>> Project and done a great job! It's entirely his choice on how > long > >> >>>>>>he > >> >>>>>> chooses to hold the position. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Michael > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Patrick Mueller < > pmuellr@gmail.com> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jukka Zitting < > >> >>> jukka.zitting@gmail.com > >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Some projects have something like a yearly rotation, while > others > >> >>> keep > >> >>>>>>>> a VP until he or she wants to resign. > >> >>>>>>> ... > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> See also > >> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc-chair > >> >>>> . > >> >>>>>>>> The main thing to remember here is that the PMC chair (V.P.) > has > >> >>>>>>>>no > >> >>>>>>>> bigger say on project matters than any other member of the PMC. > >> >>>>>>>>The > >> >>>>>>>> role is more secretarial in nature. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> It might be nice then, to have us make this a yearly rotation > >> >>>>>>>thing - > >> >>>> so > >> >>>>>>> one person doesn't feel stuck with the role, if they get tired > of > >> >>>>>>>it > >> >>> - > >> >>>> a > >> >>>>>>> year-long term sounds about right. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> OTOH, I don't have a problem with someone taking this role > >> >>>>>>>long-term > >> >>> as > >> >>>>>>> well, if they're enjoying it. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> -- > >> >>>>>>> Patrick Mueller > >> >>>>>>> http://muellerware.org > >> >>> > >> > >> > --f46d042ef517a8339904cba46bf0--