Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shazron@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CCA5E1BF.FF77%fil@adobe.com>
References: <CCA5E1BF.FF77%fil@adobe.com>
From: Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:58:09 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAE6O_-a7ihKTZsjX5aH7ffWg1b3B8pPKG+Vb7XCNJGtrC_-vyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Documenting sensor variance in our docs
To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Do all platforms document this variance? I'm for it being in our docs
(with a link for "read more" to the platform docs)

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com> wrote:
> I've had some conversations with people on twitter along the lines of
>
> "yo my accelerometer values being returned are within 5-10% of what the
> docs say they should return. Am I doing something wrong?"
>
> Should we document this variance, or defer to platform docs? Thoughts?
>