Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79F8EDB80 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78507 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2012 22:57:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 78464 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2012 22:57:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 78456 invoked by uid 99); 31 Oct 2012 22:57:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:57:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of agrieve@google.com designates 209.85.219.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.47] (HELO mail-oa0-f47.google.com) (209.85.219.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:57:51 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id h1so1951264oag.6 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:57:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :x-system-of-record; bh=I4NyXp4JEuHNfTPpSNt4JbOleDWdaKBRxhAmOOh99WE=; b=VEnL31nb7TN+3RgfRfz4ZMByEutqYx2welT4KFrpHzknDE0fjqHAUT2PzWjt5LeJR4 Sms7uXliIIcQWPknVWhLW/wGDx0oej3Kqec9IopiF4Tei/yb3yiy3E0RLXUtEybEqQIP JmVXyNYtTyalBf8HpeE2t6Ry/v/+lON5eViSG05rlFHtUZctFvUoYMM9mo3k5X+HU/PL JCcerKrMp0kBEy72VzmKUE0X3d2wmnh8jfoobWba0ThC1IkzJWv09OSZiAIYFGhP/iYB JVb/WzZmJE0gfyMzGtr1E7QdgERY1BTyDOQ7c3mJqfISUDVpEy5n2KxjxysAVkawtn5v Le7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=I4NyXp4JEuHNfTPpSNt4JbOleDWdaKBRxhAmOOh99WE=; b=erbQQJUvIkQkKruEGvyilarwAAKuWUK+JlHCP+gua7CYIw72OXuLUyGz2E9AaZO745 AykWhZenJ5wtKE65L5ySJSV1cnMH1KnJQqMg9PiVxSe+ayD9rxwmpbCsDbm4k+PDoU4T BDhnIbBuMADwaL/ZzPklqjdCUdH3/kncAnBX10JaoW4PainQf7K31rBhZ+3cE9/+sKND akfshHQwUWcqy2rO3VvPfORQA1Gm82BHUHPP/MEQ4vyqZQQJPk88nzJLve9BA+lxF2Qp 60GTZlf7iQjVmrPLIajt+ADZn4eAOeCjKmrt6ztoPP1nON/6HKEjrFPUL5dyXS0mW+aP XO6Q== Received: by 10.182.150.37 with SMTP id uf5mr31920033obb.10.1351724250836; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:57:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: agrieve@google.com Received: by 10.182.138.5 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:57:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrew Grieve Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:57:10 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: HiPckd0-v6dyiGLcDmpzGJ5qqYI Message-ID: Subject: Re: firing more ontouchmove javascript events on android? Higher resolution / precision for ontouchmove? To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51f9555ce2efe04cd62d3c7 X-System-Of-Record: true X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmpqrO3GgIXl6BYxvt1C2wBrB/tlMHTeDkgPHwrYlW5DPcPAKsjdqywCiF+LzUhDwiFpXMXd7z46ap8GDpX3I4/EPRVBxR0ux5raTrjodxkGeUCCamHt91z7KSjOoHIJTyj+Wh8vDZB5YI1bLfZzsVmkSnrDXFgks1qjG3D7St5i8UDfDoBSzT81uTEgHjeC9q66Ji4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec51f9555ce2efe04cd62d3c7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The 25x is based on the mobile-spec benchmark Braden mentioned. That's for non-synchronous plugins. There are lots of details in the bug ( issues.cordova.io/638). The 25x is based on the PROMPT+HANGING_GET number in this spreadsheet on sheet 1 vs. the JS_OBJECT + LOAD_URL number on the last sheet. Note that it's actually 24x, but 25 sounds better :). Improvements to the existing benchmark, or even new benchmarks would be a welcome contribution :) On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Braden Shepherdson wrote: > We have a bridge speed test in mobile-spec already. The last entry in the > main screen is "Benchmark". Andrew made this a while back while working on > the iOS bridge, but it should let you select between all available bridges > on whichever platform, and measure their speed. > > Braden > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Filip Maj wrote: > > > Brian recently suggested incorporating some kind of baseline bridge > > benchmark into mobile-spec. It would be nice to track the progression of > a > > standard "bridge speed" metric into our daily commits. > > > > On 10/30/12 11:19 PM, "Lorin Beer" wrote: > > > > >Hey Andrew, > > > > > >bridge speed on android is of particular interest to me, and > > >Pender > > > > > >I have a working Pender-Cordova Plugin, and a 25x increase in bridge > speed > > >would massively affect possible usage. > > >Is 25x a metric, or an approximation? > > >Do we have a benchmark tool for Cordova Android bridge speed? > > >If not, would a bridge speed benchmark tool be of interest? I wrote one > > >about a year and a half ago, and could massage it into something useful. > > > > > >- Lorin > > > > > > > > >On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Alessandro Preziosi (licnep) < > > >lsnpreziosi@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >My understanding is as follows: > > >> >Unless you preventDefault() on the touchstart event, then dragging > your > > >> >finger will attempt to scroll the page. Once scroll mode has begun, > no > > >>JS > > >> >callbacks are called until you lift your finger and exit scroll mode. > > >> great explanation, sounds like it could be the case, thanks > > >> > > > > > --bcaec51f9555ce2efe04cd62d3c7--