Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17C449554 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25738 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 22:43:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 25716 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 22:43:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 25708 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2012 22:43:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:43:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.177] (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:43:49 +0000 Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so1913233wib.0 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:43:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=MFytrvbDAY+liMpUBaOpxL2zdI5L3ZQCJ9moZhVucMg=; b=hBm5tBZaeyKHK4cVAjOgp0+4keObzOBm2VUbNw1OTcgitPYhEo44ruu7QoNefEkwJs ijKT2nHJdRpzvldW1FIWXfyJvO8ccs3heV71dzdycmgaFgiBcvyyRTliZ4WGBvfwVtSH nmp6pXU2MV0LSPKR0q4wpDeM2zX/vqSQYTIh4N6Wr1rSGz1fy//NOEcnDro9IfgjAtbd sXa4RfQ7vn22gw0UGHDGu9oH30hKaNxh2ZfUbyOutp143vGeoPJkCHuk8GjrgOX0oNNl zIZ0nPzzFgeyh7YHeNOQEARHa1F1XKtAHqZhBNN5IjGtor8BK5PmpJZkhDUfSmZITMlD xIVg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.81.135 with SMTP id a7mr19637876wiy.16.1334270608506; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.103.7 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:43:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:43:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 1.6.1 From: Joe Bowser To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444024ea77dbd04bd83156b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0444024ea77dbd04bd83156b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So, can we just rebase the head, push this out and get this rolling? On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > Correct, those iOS-specific parameters (like allow edit and those ones) > existed prior to cordova-js, so yeah, we left them in there as we didn't > want to remove without deprecation. > > If you can deal with the iOS issue without needing an API extension: then > do that. If not, leave it in there, but docs need to updated too. > > Extending and changing the public API is a long and difficult process for > us and will only get tougher with every platform we add support to. > > On 4/12/12 3:37 PM, "Shazron" wrote: > > >Then we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS parameters ones that > >already exist in common if you noticed. Don't know how we merge > >(unmerge?) this one properly because taking those out will break > >everyone that is using it, but a deprecation is the way to go as per > >http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy . We can remove this > >new commit and I'll find a way to get this in somehow. > > > > > > > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > >> The problem is that this parameter doesn't belong in the common API. > >>It'd > >> be just ignored in Android, but the whole point of cordova-js is so that > >> it's common. It'd look pretty screwed up to add this to the docs, IMO. > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron wrote: > >> > >>> To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > >>> > so what's the point of this new parameter? > >>> > > >>> > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" wrote: > >>> > > >>> >>I did. Do we want to revert the cordova-js? I can branch 1.6.0 and > >>> >>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1 > >>> >> > >>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > >>> >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs for this. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Shaz can you comment? > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks like it's intended for both > >>> Android > >>> >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be in 1.6.1. > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip Maj wrote: > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>>> I was actually just looking at that myself. > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param.. sigh. We gotta stop doing > >>>that, > >>> >>>>> especially if we don't update documentation. > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize param for Camera.getPicture > >>>yet? I > >>> >>>>> >didn't > >>> >>>>> >notice that change until now. > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip Maj > >>>wrote: > >>> >>>>> > > >>> >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task in the JS should work > >>>properly > >>> >>>>>now. > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake tasks in the future and > >>>make > >>> >>>>>them > >>> >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th "async" parameter to the > >>>task() > >>> >>>>> >>function > >>> >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call complete() when the task is done. > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> See http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.js for > >>>an > >>> >>>>> example. > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser" wrote: > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is tagged 1.6.1. > >>> >>>>> >> > > >>> >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Anis KADRI < > >>> anis.kadri@gmail.com> > >>> >>>>> >>wrote: > >>> >>>>> >> > > >>> >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1 before end of day today > >>>after > >>> >>>>>some > >>> >>>>> >> >> thorough testing. > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Shazron > >>> > >>> >>>>>wrote: > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version tag as well in jira... > >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>> >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Shazron > >>> > >>> >>>>> wrote: > >>> >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was released, I'm going to > >>> >>>>>"Release" > >>> >>>>>the > >>> >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and move outstanding issues to > >>>1.7.0 > >>> >>>>> >>version > >>> >>>>> >> >> > > tag. > >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > >>> >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Filip Maj > >>> > >>> >>>>> wrote: > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too. Since adding the commit ID > >>>into > >>> >>>>>the > >>> >>>>> >> >> packaging > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default task isn't running > >>>properly. > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake build" and "jake test" but > >>>not > >>> >>>>> >>"jake" on > >>> >>>>> >> >> its > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure it out. > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM, "Shazron" > >>>wrote: > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging. iOS has a few commits (one > >>>commit > >>> >>>>>in > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim for first thing tomorrow for > >>>you > >>> >>>>>to > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage? > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Steven Gill > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote: > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been discovered in Cordova Android that > >>> >>>>>requires > >>> >>>>> >>a > >>> >>>>> >> >>new > >>> >>>>> >> >> > tag > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check out the bug on the issue > >>>tracker > >>> >>>>>at > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809# > >>> >>>>>co > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809 > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to just repackage 1.6.0 with > >>>this > >>> >>>>>bug > >>> >>>>> >> >>fixed as > >>> >>>>> >> >> > we > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know if people are experiencing > >>>this > >>> >>>>>or > >>> >>>>> >>not. > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also had some major issues > >>>which he > >>> >>>>>has > >>> >>>>> >>fixed > >>> >>>>> >> >> now > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1 release. > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts? > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> >> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>> > >>> > > >>> > > --f46d0444024ea77dbd04bd83156b--