cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bryce Curtis <>
Subject Re: Cordova-Android now up-to-date in the ASF Git Repo
Date Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:10:32 GMT

I took a look at your pull request and commented on it.  I will create 
cordova-android on github today, so you can do a new pull request on 
that repository.


On 1/4/12 9:48 AM, Olivier Brand wrote:
> All,
> I have a pull request in callback android. What should we/ you do?
> Olivier
> Olivier
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:04, Simon MacDonald<>  wrote:
>> I've been able to setup and build cordova-android. Wondering the same
>> thing as Bryce, how do we handle pull requests, etc?
>> Simon Mac Donald
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Bryce Curtis<>  wrote:
>>> I was able to set up git and clone, so Android must be good.  Are we ready
>>> to use the apache git for commits from now on?  How are pull requests made
>>> and what is the easiest way to commit/approve them?
>>> On 1/3/12 1:27 PM, Patrick Mueller wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 14:08, Joe Bowser<>   wrote:
>>>>> I've synced up the changes for Cordova-Android, and after going through
>>>>> the
>>>>> process, I think it makes sense if each platform maintainer just does
>>>>> push up to their respective repositories the changes that they have been
>>>>> maintaining to date.  This way, we can be sure that most people are set
>>>>> up
>>>>> to commit to the new repositories, and I won't have to sift through
>>>>> things
>>>>> that I'm unfamiliar with.  I see that Patrick has already done this with
>>>>> weinre, which tipped me off.
>>>>> Are we doing this right?
>>>> I think this is exactly what we want to do, modulo having to do global
>>>> "mark read"s on the torrent of emails flowing into my new filtered
>>>> "commits" label in GMail.  :-)  Would be nice to get a single push's
>>>> commit's bundled into one message, but I reckon this flood is a one-time
>>>> thing, so ... no worries.
>>>> Actually, just checked the email, and they're coming from "
>>>>" - I suppose we should create new
>>>> ml's for the 3 "callback" ml's we have, to "cordova" ones.

View raw message