Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D578790BB for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35398 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2011 22:05:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-callback-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35382 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2011 22:05:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact callback-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35374 invoked by uid 99); 31 Oct 2011 22:05:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:05:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of purdrew@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:05:32 +0000 Received: by mail-bw0-f47.google.com with SMTP id zv3so2579483bkb.6 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:05:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GrplZAf+vp2TaV0CP7fgoOZcAwZ3azI8AseCJ4p/ZLQ=; b=EBM3cdp9bXA7rhvCmZhgiqHViZclza4ImnorPwRcyO/GsCT70+2RTwqwJpMskAHUol Q2OuujdL1JdAlupyOOK0rL0L4hBVMulZnuyHp7ChvAfX5mh/kR1CF8yoKGpzpR+JO2AZ ytt7dk8iXZzv9ivHsUhwz/dQRnxzQT0KyhuBk= Received: by 10.204.45.65 with SMTP id d1mr12798576bkf.9.1320098712117; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:05:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: purdrew@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.70.195 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:04:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <669FD20FA9C6D4408948A6DB6DBE9B790CBC4F8B@TK5EX14MBXC122.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> From: Drew Walters Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:04:51 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: v_bMLprZyWTukVHe62auhrzAoUE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [phonegap-dev] Re: PhoneGap 1.2.x To: phonegap-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555921ecde22e04b09f6edb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00032555921ecde22e04b09f6edb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Done. On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Michael Brooks wrote: > Yea, go ahead and push it up. > > I think your local modification is conflicting with the find & replace in > `ant version`. We can create an issue and look at it later. > > Michael > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Drew Walters wrote: > >> Apparently I lied. Just reran and only updated VERSION file. I >> apparently had previously modified Device.java manually prior to knowing of >> the ant target. If we don't update the variable in Device.java then >> window.device.phonegap will return 1.0. You want me to go ahead and push >> and tag my manual changes? >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Michael Brooks wrote: >> >>> Ah great. >>> >>> If you think it looks okay then go ahead and commit/tag/push! >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Drew Walters wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Michael, FYI, I ran the ant script locally and it looked ok. It >>>> updated VERSION and Device.java which is what I would expect. I did not >>>> push the changes or tag since you are going to do it. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Michael Brooks >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot Drew, >>>>> >>>>> I'll tag this release (and accept blame if I mess it up again). I just >>>>> want to make sure that the the ANT script does the job correctly. >>>>> >>>>> Michael >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Drew Walters wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Excellent, thanks Michael. I hadn't noticed that in the README >>>>>> before. I've pushed all the changes I need to make so BlackBerry is ready >>>>>> to be tagged. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Michael Brooks < >>>>>> mikeywbrooks@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Drew, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This was a mistake on my side. We were rushing the release and I >>>>>>> didn't update phonegap-blackberry-webworks properly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've documented how to do a proper release in the README and >>>>>>> automated it with an ANT command. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Michael >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Monday, 31 October, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Drew Walters wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I noticed the previous BlackBerry move from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0 only >>>>>>> updated the VERSION file: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/callback/callback-blackberry/commit/8caf6193b2b4ed9b59e6bce6eca79777e8582d21 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> whereas previously we were updating Device.java, library.xml and >>>>>>> config.xml: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/phonegap/phonegap-blackberry-webworks/commit/f42a61c2d1884b45fe00eb754e2657b20b3ed272 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Was this intentional or were some changes missed? I could >>>>>>> understand not updating library.xml and config.xml because it minimizes >>>>>>> impact to application developers but Device.java should be updated with >>>>>>> proper version. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thoughts? I can make changes if responses are quick otherwise I >>>>>>> will be passing out candy :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Steve wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If everyone is ready, I was hoping you guys could tag your repos >>>>>>> 1.2.0. I can package it up and ship it today. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> -Steve >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > I think Brian is referring to a phonegap release from Nitobi, not >>>>>>> a Callback release from the Incubator. Sort of "flush the queue" kind of >>>>>>> stuff before starting to work 100% within the ASF. Is that the case? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> precisely so >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -Steve Gill >>>>>>> Nitobi Software >>>>>>> www.nitobi.com >>>>>>> http://twitter.com/#!/stevesgill >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > --00032555921ecde22e04b09f6edb--