Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 248FEDC4E for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 18:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46748 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2012 18:42:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 46687 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2012 18:42:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 46674 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2012 18:42:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:42:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.138.90.70] (HELO nm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.90.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:42:02 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.48] by nm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Oct 2012 18:41:40 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.248] by tm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Oct 2012 18:41:40 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1040.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Oct 2012 18:41:40 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 909163.78973.bm@omp1040.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 72121 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2012 18:41:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Subject:References:From:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version; b=exiuJ0YJT3BeDjBDCMdTQzn6rxlZnbez4LwDjHmvM0YEvUtIiMZrJqilndovnDhfE7CojnI3u3tg1hMqb2f2nFPoqmbE1aV3tKmD2yAgIYpz25cem6V+K3q6MPv9mN4/pO9xh6wwF+/eOEImNItQWJTn+Uuzps/R5aE4mteIb00= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1349376100; bh=9WK4jG2nt1Ams6PSjFnxfp+IhmV3/HEFyvpVbGhaR4I=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Subject:References:From:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version; b=mQnE3legnjDc5c7ysq0WkFS1mdAaAgk634yPTfe59jLBV9SjliXHsQ1R0A6tWIs4aMB5UmwqbYeSpGVxqdwwG2X+iicwC+G6oLktIIfm1YIsNEPQOEFuwaA8iTfoYefBU80RNnauE0ItNLWRzhUJLLzXj4dDoXVl/OyK7MogvfE= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: AkJqfP4VM1m_doeoJdWZW0DBnVisWkMfESRNv3uQm1cBZk3 eQ9Ptt2WDDl6GQj1IH7QZfXUbCmU79XcaE2iY1PcMrZXuPTbKySBkRTu3NYr f0RH8X0a5BL_l_jmn8bNC0Zxbf0S4yU.VeKqR2sRTTrfZy5SzCKUYYuZ9H9r 4vBGGHFyh4eYxRDLncaK7C5peqsXvLn3Bd1KE7fAvpmM9IPu9WcmpBdVFrLs MhBIBsdFFdK6zkqnWJzBzYrI403qTTMEWdUx1deCvCjXp5pDE77ZOJISjfUh EFrzORQL_b8ot5ApZa4i6QgcagTYU.pt1yGbG5zAM5Y2pUdRZOYghfCo44R8 INKBb8GrWLyhUdDrbDQt9ifxBcb9UvkI_HKTpyXkJU39m69qA2gZ4Z8dApFj HGemlNOpMFkAyn7T5lCqLzsjDRol7DICrvavvttwp9jQneMvZ56TvVXQAIrb .wyzR87VwPiE- X-Yahoo-SMTP: 8SeyWoiswBB21nIHoap5pcHGstqJgS4- Received: from [192.168.1.103] (elstonkers@98.238.28.69 with xymcookie) by smtp112-mob.biz.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 04 Oct 2012 11:41:40 -0700 PDT Subject: Re: Ant Build Failing in Continuum References: <6B123C9C-CB1E-4F2D-AB40-B0D12CA405B2@yahoo.com> From: Eric Fetzer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A403) In-Reply-To: <6B123C9C-CB1E-4F2D-AB40-B0D12CA405B2@yahoo.com> Message-Id: <74707364-39D3-481D-AB88-E93AC5204742@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:41:37 -0400 To: Continuum User Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org No takers? Is this forum monitored at all since Wendy left? On Oct 2, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Eric Fetzer wrote: > All, >=20 > We have an ant build that we're running in continuum that seems to fail on= ly when multi-threading. When we turn off multi-threading (set threadcount t= o 1), it succeeds. Is there an issue in continuum with multi-threading? Us= ing the following for parallel threads: >=20 > > > > > > > >=20 > Thanks, > Eric