continuum-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Höller <mar...@xss.co.at>
Subject Re: Class file not generated on build?
Date Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:31:33 GMT
The answer is yes.

But you are getting off topic, this is rather subversion releated than
continuum.

hth,
- martin

On 24 Oct 2008, Jan K wrote:

> 
> Thanks wendy.I have another doubt.Should i follow the same structure for ant
> project?
> 
> Wendy Smoak-3 wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Jan K <janokb@symbiountech.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have a folder structure in svn as
> >>  Training  -- This is my root folder
> >>  pom.xml
> >>  Inside Training Folder ,i have
> >>    -- Branch
> >>   --  Tag
> >>   -- Trunk
> >>  Inside Trunk folder,i have
> >>   Test.Java
> > 
> > It seems strange to have a pom.xml *above* the trunk directory.
> > 
> > The Subversion convention is trunk, branches and tags.
> > 
> > Your pom would normally go inside trunk, leaving branches and tags for
> > "copies" of your project at appropriate times.  And by default your
> > source code goes in src/main/java/[package structure].
> > 
> > For example, compare your project structure to what you get from
> > 
> > mvn archetype:create -DgroupId=com.example -DartifactId=myproject
> > 
> > (or see
> > http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html
> > which has more information.)
> > 
> > Training/
> >     trunk/
> >          pom.xml
> >               src/main/java/com/acme/training/Test.java
> > 
> > (Again, pasting xml into Nabble doesn't seem to work, it strips the
> > element names out, so I couldn't read the pom.)
> > 
> > -- 
> > Wendy
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Class-file-not-generated-on-build--tp20090919p20145810.html
> Sent from the Continuum - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 


Mime
View raw message