Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80437 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2008 15:11:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2008 15:11:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 28734 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2008 15:11:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 28702 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2008 15:11:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for users@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 63305 invoked by uid 99); 23 Sep 2008 14:28:30 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,452,1217800800"; d="scan'208";a="129047374" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: SV: running n parallel Continuum installations Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:28:02 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: running n parallel Continuum installations Thread-Index: AckdcPpldoqh3cX0SOiebAPkfcoXtQAC77rA From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2008 14:28:02.0856 (UTC) FILETIME=[96256280:01C91D88] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org How about looking for subtasks that could be parallelized beneath the build-task, i.e. compile, assembly, package, report generation, and other Maven plugin tasks. These tasks will not have an impact on the local repository, but are still resource-intensive (especially javadoc generation) . Many of these are serial dependent within one build, but compilation in x different projects, for instance, are not. This could boost performance of building multiple projects, but would require some synchronization between builds when it comes to install and dependeny resolution. Well, this is maybe more a Maven thing, than Continuum. By the way, the maven-compiler-plugin support a fork av a jvm, and this will be executed in a thread of its own. Have anyone got experiences with this and performance? Most servers used today have multi-core cpus or even multiple cpus. If you have 2 quad-core cpus, there is a potential of running 8 parallel threads.=20 Odd -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com]=20 Sendt: 23. september 2008 13:39 Til: users@continuum.apache.org Emne: Re: running n parallel Continuum installations The potential issue with a single local repo with a parallel build is if two build try to download or install the same artifact in it. Emmanuel On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Lustig, Marc (Allianz Deutschland, externer Mitarbeiter) wrote: > > Our project contains several hundred Maven-projects, which need to get > tested and snaphots built using Continuum. > My plan is to install a number of Continuum-webapps into a single=20 > JBoss AS-container, each one having its dedicated database. > Anybody sees any potential issues in such scenario? > > (I read on the list that there is an issue related to accessing the=20 > local mvn-repo, but I don't understand what actually might cause any=20 > trouble > here?!) > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This email with attachments is solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Please also be aware that the DnB NOR Group cannot accept any payment orders or other legally binding correspondence wi= th customers as a part of an email.=20 This email message has been virus checked by the anti virus programs used in the DnB NOR Group. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *