From users-return-6913-apmail-continuum-users-archive=continuum.apache.org@continuum.apache.org Wed Sep 03 06:49:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91211 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2008 06:49:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2008 06:49:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 65472 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2008 06:49:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 65433 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2008 06:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 65422 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2008 06:49:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:49:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bjorn.de.bakker@accenture.com designates 170.252.72.95 as permitted sender) Received: from [170.252.72.95] (HELO ememr1003.accenture.com) (170.252.72.95) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 06:48:28 +0000 Received: from EMEXV1003.dir.svc.accenture.com (emexv1003.dir.svc.accenture.com [10.130.16.106]) by ememr1003.accenture.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m836jKGZ012329 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 07:45:27 +0100 (WEST) Received: from emexr1001.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.130.16.110]) by EMEXV1003.dir.svc.accenture.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 08:45:15 +0200 Received: from EMEXM0202.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.130.16.141]) by emexr1001.dir.svc.accenture.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 08:45:15 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Have projects with Build and Trunk Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 08:45:16 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Have projects with Build and Trunk Thread-Index: AckNkJ+eI2p2u6weRv2bKhMxiKXn8Q== From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Sep 2008 06:45:15.0440 (UTC) FILETIME=[9F36F300:01C90D90] X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org In our project we use SVN as SCM system and we have 3 "folders". One for= the Trunk, one for the Branches and one for the tags. The Branch is our= working copy. We develop in the branch and commit our changes on a dail= y basis. =20 When our changes are tested and ready to release, we move our branch to o= ur trunk, build the package, run our final tests and create a package whi= ch can be deployed in a production environment. =20 What we want to achieve is that we have 2 project groups in Continuum, on= e which will check the branch and one for the Trunk, which will execute o= nce a week (for example on Friday). The problem is that I can't manage t= o make the schedule work. I found this link on the internet: http://www.= mail-archive.com/continuum-users@maven.apache.org/msg02884.html. Is it true that it's not possible to create 2 projects with the same proj= ectid, artifactid and version? Is there a workaround to make this kind o= f setup work? This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privile= ged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received= it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the origina= l. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.