From users-return-7050-apmail-continuum-users-archive=continuum.apache.org@continuum.apache.org Tue Sep 23 14:08:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42735 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2008 14:08:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2008 14:08:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 20982 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2008 14:08:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 20954 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2008 14:08:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 20943 invoked by uid 99); 23 Sep 2008 14:08:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:08:29 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of oliver.lamy@gmail.com designates 209.85.134.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.134.184] (HELO mu-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.134.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:07:31 +0000 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so2005310mue.0 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:07:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=U804+irRezZ+uxDwCzpKYXQILOsES5nEdNIGGyQLoTw=; b=LnFi74P2vblaQmGk26PbulfbyAVN3VfZgxryjIMci2/AybzL3IJX4mJN6V6CcEn28c Q1KnyuNqnA6rx25q6OZ+p4Mi9SjJEQkFYoTNafotQ7hyvRvJproQCtIYBaXy0KhTWFM+ vd3Y890q5UR/DbVJZAaAcUZ8BBCqax1ihsv4g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=mCiDTB++3cOo0m0kW46Eu6Oa5jUPD+rp/1/vOrYIt8FU+/uHNfizmajQy72zIaXQvU uw0iIO3WMhRgV5smGyMxKf+Vrz7ZTe1J3akKAPztbz7Bw3ACvGlXdkDw44R9gW0CIjs+ 8+a+aGM0tciQQ5vZXUy8h3uQODGW0GidSiVzQ= Received: by 10.187.175.6 with SMTP id c6mr736858fap.89.1222178867206; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.187.183.8 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9948cb690809230707j700a7702y5ab5ce100c8032fb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:07:47 +0200 From: "Olivier Lamy" Sender: oliver.lamy@gmail.com To: users@continuum.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: running n parallel Continuum installations In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <19624090.post@talk.nabble.com> <9948cb690809230225y32a4497dgf5219682a4dfdfbe@mail.gmail.com> <48D8E577.2050300@apache.org> <48D8F008.7030704@yahoo-inc.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: ae084e96d4259407 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Maybe we can/could allow parrallel builds for different localRepo. The current build queue could be split in different ones (one for each defined localRepo). -- Olivier 2008/9/23 Lustig, Marc (Allianz Deutschland, externer Mitarbeiter) : > > If the local repo is the bottle-neck to allow multiple build-queues, then= , yes, it would make sense to have the 1:1 relation between the local repo = and the build-queue! > Perhaps for Continuum 1.2 refactoring is needed to realize this. > > > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Benoit Decherf [mailto:decherfb@yahoo-inc.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. September 2008 15:33 > An: users@continuum.apache.org > Betreff: Re: AW: running n parallel Continuum installations > > But it still not possible to run parrallele build of the different > project group ? This is not the same problem, but I think that it will > be great to be able to build the diferent project group independently > and in parrallel. > There should be one build queue per local repository. > >> Continuum 1.2 allows you to configure multiple local repositories-- >> one for each project group if you want. >> >> > >