From users-return-6906-apmail-continuum-users-archive=continuum.apache.org@continuum.apache.org Mon Sep 01 13:27:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48223 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2008 13:27:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2008 13:27:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 21981 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2008 13:26:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 21951 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2008 13:26:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for users@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 10101 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2008 13:18:52 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jimmycnw@gmail.com designates 72.14.204.175 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:content-language:thread-index; bh=iGQUkXi813+1lJmqyLW3d97fDGGsJ5LcJwF66c+noLQ=; b=M5eiZ3bwpaEM6CZZthXRv2V2QUz6ourjPNHzW0jSU/P3xdwCK69zpxlA8I1bZljZFj qw+WniWJcJnsP/jOh0xywCg0/AYFUSvWHZTmvv8dhto97NM0T0J1EdHVFAkG0fluS3al FGjm4C2NIQzgeMwZMfBil0g/VV4DaC+g2QXUo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:content-language :thread-index; b=CmzgqcCVD9d+badsZ0ni/z86KcDIJ3P9WdQtzKRoa215pQOwYqyaRGgLZjdJJA+KNQ mW/8c+o5lvMMVPNB+Nx/S3zc9lBWL1Hq1xq5bjWnpG6jJo3AYNQs3gMNDqQvEWoU4BwQ DKyZQ5SZrD5H8F6/zerdTMCpC2PiIItjpkjjo= From: "Jimmy Conway" To: References: <11ea01c90c29$d2312b80$76938280$@com> In-Reply-To: <11ea01c90c29$d2312b80$76938280$@com> Subject: RE: base.dn in security.properties - why it uses not the full line? Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 15:18:11 +0200 Message-ID: <120401c90c35$307cb910$91762b30$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-language: en-us thread-index: AckMKF96/rH7MX42SIy1+nIwqdA+oQADLi6g X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I found the solution. I just removed this line: ldap.config.mapper.attribute.user.base.dn I don't know why, but it works now :) Jim -----Original Message----- From: Jimmy Conway [mailto:jimmycnw@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 1:57 PM To: users@continuum.apache.org Subject: base.dn in security.properties - why it uses not the full line? There is a problem with LDAP configuration. I specified these lines in /conf/security.properties. ldap.config.base.dn=ou=OrgUnit,dc=,dc=com ldap.config.mapper.attribute.user.base.dn=ou=OrgUnit,dc=,dc=com ( includes the name of my real domain name) And this is what I get in continuum.log: 2008-09-01 07:43:22,871 [btpool0-7] INFO ldapController - Searching for user: guest 2008-09-01 07:43:22,871 [btpool0-7] INFO ldapController - Searching for users with filter: '(&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)(uid=guest))' from base dn: ou=OrgUnit 2008-09-01 07:43:22,932 [btpool0-7] ERROR userManager#ldap - Failed to find user: guest Why it cuts out the rest of the base.dn? Why base dn is only "ou=OrgUnit"? Below in log I see this also: Caused by: javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: [LDAP: error code 32 - No Such Object]; remaining name 'ou=OrgUnit' I'm talking about latest version of Continuum from /trunk. Thanks in advance! Jim __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3403 (20080901) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3404 (20080901) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3404 (20080901) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com