Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25613 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2008 15:22:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jul 2008 15:22:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 73393 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2008 15:22:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 73370 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2008 15:22:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 73359 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2008 15:22:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:22:49 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:21:54 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KNr1n-0004tk-Ur for users@continuum.apache.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:22:19 -0700 Message-ID: <18714547.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:22:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Raffaele To: users@continuum.apache.org Subject: Re: The project was not built because no changes were detected in sources since the last build. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: r.gambelli@prismasw.it X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >> Should the correct behaviour be that if there was a source change, a build >> should be done either with or without "Fresh build" checked option? > if source changed, with/without "Fresh build", a build is started and this > part works fine. We use it every days on few servers. Emmanuel, I'm trying for days to launch a scheduled build (defined by me) WITH Fresh build WITH source changes BUT Continuum says: the project was not built because no changes were detected in sources since the last build. And so, I'm wrong in something or your every days test aren't telling the truth? In your environment do you use default build definitions or you have your own? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/The-project-was-not-built-because-no-changes-were-detected-in-sources-since-the-last-build.-tp18687862p18714547.html Sent from the Continuum - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.