From users-return-6776-apmail-continuum-users-archive=continuum.apache.org@continuum.apache.org Tue Jul 29 09:02:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 563 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2008 09:02:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jul 2008 09:02:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 18724 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2008 09:02:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 18695 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2008 09:02:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 18684 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2008 09:02:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:02:33 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.191] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:01:38 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so1493253nfc.20 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:02:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=r2UPbhQvMwIyHv2XWeFVdhlOxwAi8nQUW5FLKJmBFBM=; b=nJEdm+eHAQLv6u0S47g4iM5W93/Pg74tc63Y4KiR8MjG61Y2UkvxmA6ob5jEe2AUZB Y6o+L7UwzgtB4FY/cSBCF5M4Y/0VJGlOAZcxGeBv/jBO0YniMHB6M8IKZnVQfOndLZXH HLU7dgByoSxcW1TdOs4sIzPB5/d3YiRKPYR9E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=PmxOdD61p/glc6f+YZouln7ILu+r7vI8PAWwbPqSiMtqRwlVZ3+m7EKXBYieOznbAs np76WqLnCLu8ue6S4D4iG6+WcSjdyD9bcxHiJ6Vb3pTEgbiFQEC/+ulKk8Wnup8Zmlvs 1hAb0gDUDD7hgITH7q9ZTAUUWuzwM3Y/Nghak= Received: by 10.210.39.20 with SMTP id m20mr7266730ebm.126.1217322122559; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.34.8 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:02:02 +0200 From: "Emmanuel Venisse" To: users@continuum.apache.org Subject: Re: The project was not built because no changes were detected in sources since the last build. In-Reply-To: <18707402.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_17529_33356558.1217322122556" References: <18687862.post@talk.nabble.com> <7CA45EC6F903DA4EB4ADB6D08D24B0F63393C4A7@fnbfdtmx01.fnb.co.za> <18687944.post@talk.nabble.com> <18707402.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_17529_33356558.1217322122556 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hmm, maybe we have an issue on this part. If build fresh is checked, the always build should be set to true automatically even if it isn't checked by the users. It's a non-sense to do a build fresh without to build always. Can you file an issue? and check your "always build" checkbox Emmanuel On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Raffaele wrote: > > Hi all, > > is there anybody who can explain me how solve my issue? > I'm able to reproduce always....Continumm simply doesn't build my project > when there are source changes, Continuum does a fresh build and after says > that no changes were detected in sources since the last build. > > In this way, I never have builds of my project. > My build definition has > Build Fresh = true > Always Build = false > > Obviously If I set Always build to true, project build would be done > > Perhaps am I wrong in understanding Continuum build mechanism? > > Best regards > Raffaele > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/The-project-was-not-built-because-no-changes-were-detected-in-sources-since-the-last-build.-tp18687862p18707402.html > Sent from the Continuum - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------=_Part_17529_33356558.1217322122556--