From users-return-6643-apmail-continuum-users-archive=continuum.apache.org@continuum.apache.org Thu Jun 26 14:42:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4324 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2008 14:42:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jun 2008 14:42:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 63569 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2008 14:42:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-users-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 63531 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2008 14:42:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 63520 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2008 14:42:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:42:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com designates 74.125.44.154 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.44.154] (HELO yx-out-1718.google.com) (74.125.44.154) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:41:35 +0000 Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 34so23173yxf.50 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:41:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=m2uJ5gCCxaDpOgmdlNqbgFA0k0cg4Que7Pnn+Vi+8ts=; b=WdNLWxpceOunwXkpaWrnm5fL1nQdAkDzhHuPGJvIqrZcDzm2Uc2Tx5xXbpLuWONwSm +VrbznNhe1rj56+CkB24nHlzxj/2cR+p+1EhKcrITH9aW0B37QQ/6CtmLNaNIFmY7oVk orFOHNn1R4uZDW/O4Wu1wcoNlWTwYXa3dbOUk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=FviMvIm8thc72/Z9zHRbwf7PTeV2ruJXQ+3w7h3nzwNePa2BUhs34H9iSM/1GCz6P9 X60Cw8I/CsPoB2pgKiA4eybFAKw0GjtccPFEfQMN2hC1q6tWR2lp+N4CzpRjRgQtITqT whlf2Fic4TzSUKRZxND1W5iAU9VZa2s262HWA= Received: by 10.114.148.1 with SMTP id v1mr7307557wad.21.1214491313788; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.72.4 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:41:53 +0200 From: "Emmanuel Venisse" To: users@continuum.apache.org Subject: Re: Archiva/Continuum Failover In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1469_1836049.1214491313757" References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_1469_1836049.1214491313757 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline without Quartz? how do you want to do it? All schedules are stored in the db so if you unactivate them on an instance= , schedules will be unactivated on the other one too. Emmanuel On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Lustig, Marc (Allianz Deutschland, externe= r Mitarbeiter) wrote: > ok you're right, but if that's the only issue, then the second instance > simply could be started without Quartz. But then it's not a real fail-ove= r > anymore. > An alternative strategy is to maintain only one instance, and cron-watchi= ng > it with a shell-script. Need to think about it... > > > > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Juni 2008 14:36 > An: users@continuum.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Archiva/Continuum Failover > > I don't know for Archiva, but for Continuum, you can't because Continuum > run > some scheduler that launch builds and update the DB; So if you have more > than one instance for a DB, your build will be started on every nodes at > the > same time > > Emmanuel > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Lustig, Marc (Allianz Deutschland, > externer Mitarbeiter) wrote: > > > hi, > > we want to run a fail-over scenario with two installations for > > Archiva/Continuum each. > > Has anybody tried to connect both installations to the same > MySQL-instance > > ? > > Is there any special locking configuration needed for this? > > > ------=_Part_1469_1836049.1214491313757--