continuum-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Emmanuel Venisse" <emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Archiva/Continuum Failover
Date Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:41:53 GMT
without Quartz? how do you want to do it?
All schedules are stored in the db so if you unactivate them on an instance,
schedules will be unactivated on the other one too.

Emmanuel

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Lustig, Marc (Allianz Deutschland, externer
Mitarbeiter) <EXTERN.LUSTIG_MARC@allianz.de> wrote:

> ok you're right, but if that's the only issue, then the second instance
> simply could be started without Quartz. But then it's not a real fail-over
> anymore.
> An alternative strategy is to maintain only one instance, and cron-watching
> it with a shell-script. Need to think about it...
>
>
>
> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Juni 2008 14:36
> An: users@continuum.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Archiva/Continuum Failover
>
> I don't know for Archiva, but for Continuum, you can't because Continuum
> run
> some scheduler that launch builds and update the DB; So if you have more
> than one instance for a DB, your build will be started on every nodes at
> the
> same time
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Lustig, Marc (Allianz Deutschland,
> externer Mitarbeiter) <EXTERN.LUSTIG_MARC@allianz.de> wrote:
>
> > hi,
> > we want to run a fail-over scenario with two installations for
> > Archiva/Continuum each.
> > Has anybody tried to connect both installations to the same
> MySQL-instance
> > ?
> > Is there any special locking configuration needed for this?
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message