Return-Path: 
 <continuum-users-return-5226-apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive=maven.apache.org@maven.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89442 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2007 16:17:28 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 2007 16:17:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 8107 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2007 16:17:16 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive@maven.apache.org
Received: (qmail 7688 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2007 16:17:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact continuum-users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:continuum-users-help@maven.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:continuum-users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:continuum-users@maven.apache.org>
List-Id: <continuum-users.maven.apache.org>
Reply-To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Received: (qmail 7677 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2007 16:17:15 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:17:15 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of francisdb@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.235 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.162.235] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.235)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:17:15 +0000
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id x3so905241nzd
        for <continuum-users@maven.apache.org>;
 Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:16:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=jEPrHpEu1ZEH38xYpvgJ0dVRRyzncsOlstkcktAgksc=;
        b=c9tWaa0tg8X/OZTlRL/XDEsx0KJKNhtBjiOtJvFJhqh7x/PS0mD4f5c8axn08mDrG75S7JlefVR81ojg8VzWuwpnMOtt782oHRvQMQig2IxbkLd8M/Je2YLJnYaaTAVoSk9QFNHRVM/EAswwF8NS7lU6u0eW2+8zPK+4n/zlgVw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=IpwbR+OgVra/n7N2/hmScH8Cj+THhxBH9coUw8/MM6T230OvFpFVPtQd3K8Nmtw1w/5q/qplFU7PXh8QuaM/Td4d7ulDJEFLzltg2TajzprlR/UMaL2dk58fQ5ZhWrqctAKhpydqMo6LDt+Dmk3kZXZsLajHK7ADTT0a+K+xPeI=
Received: by 10.142.140.14 with SMTP id n14mr1285903wfd.1194884206387;
        Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:16:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.101.13 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:16:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3ab983230711120816l116971fbtaa0b1a188650aee@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:16:46 +0100
From: "Francis De Brabandere" <francisdb@gmail.com>
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cobertura give me a wrong result and the next execution is right
In-Reply-To: <13708174.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <47387509.7090604@globant.com>
	 <3ab983230711120752g7d6a930dyf37189866e8598df@mail.gmail.com>
	 <13708174.post@talk.nabble.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

I think this might be something to ask on the cobertura mailing list
rather than here. I used to have cobertura problems but they were gone
after switching back to version 2.0 instead of 2.1

add this to your <build><plugins>

			<plugin>
				<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
				<artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
				<version>2.0</version><!-- version 2.1 is broken? -->
				<executions>
					<execution>
						<goals>
							<goal>clean</goal>
						</goals>
					</execution>
				</executions>
			</plugin>



On Nov 12, 2007 5:02 PM, mav007ar <mav007ar@yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
>
> Yes, by example, there are some classes that have 98% of line coverage and
> cobertura switch between this results and 2%
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Francis De Brabandere-2 wrote:
> >
> > could you give some more details about 'wrong results'?
> >
> > On Nov 12, 2007 4:45 PM, Martin Alejandro Villalobos
> > <martin.villalobos@globant.com> wrote:
> >> Hello, I'm having a problem
> >> I'm executing Continuum with a lot of projects including submodules.
> >> CI is executing clean install site site:deploy , including cobertura in
> >> these reports.
> >> The trouble is that Cobertura give wrong results one time and right in
> >> the next execution , and so on.
> >> Some knows wich is the problem.
> >>
> >> Thanks .
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Martin.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.somatik.be
> > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Cobertura-give-me-a-wrong-result-and-the-next-execution-is-right-tf4791862.html#a13708174
> Sent from the Continuum - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



-- 
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.