continuum-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "VanIngen, Erik (ESTG)" <Erik.VanIn...@fao.org>
Subject RE: continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000?
Date Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:37:31 GMT
Thanks you Emmanuel, I know enough. I will propose our team to migrate to
Linux!

-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:emmanuel@venisse.net] 
Sent: 07 November 2007 08:35
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000?


I don't have a windows 2000 to test.

I have an instance there with more than 100 projects on win XP and it works
fine and at ASF (http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/) an instance on Linux
that works fine too.

Emmanuel

VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) a écrit :
> We are very enthousiastic about Continuum. But Continuum on Windows 
> 2000 is in our configuration not stable. More or less every week an 
> instability occurs.  Our configuration is plain and very 
> straightforward. We build 4 projects which takes about 10 minutes (3 
> java projects and 1 web project). The schedule is every hour. There 
> are threads or processes remaining which are breaking the build of the 
> next hour. And thereofore we consider Continuum on Windows 2000 as not 
> stable. We did play with memory settings. It might be very well stable 
> on other platforms. In fact we are considering moving to Linux. The 
> question is, will that solve our problems?
> 
> Erik van Ingen
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:emmanuel@venisse.net]
> Sent: 06 November 2007 14:18
> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Re: continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000?
> 
> 
> Continuum is stable, but the stability can depends on lot of things 
> (nb projects, schedule interval, build time average by project, 
> memory,
> processor....)
> 
> Emmanuel
> 
> VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) a écrit :
>> Hi continuum,
>>
>> We are working fine with continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. The
>> only annoying thing is that instability things keep happening like 
>> described below. The reason is that some java processes or threads of 
>> Continuum are remaining and locking resources.
>>
>> We don't want to upgrade to continuum 1.1-beta-4, unless it is
>> resolving stability issues like below. Am I right to say that beta-4 
>> in not improving the stability of Continuum?
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Erik
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: VanIngen, Erik (ESTG)
>> Sent: 05 November 2007 09:24
>> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
>> Subject: Build Error: svn: Working copy '.' locked
>>
>>
>> Hi continuum,
>>
>> We are using continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. It is working fine
>> but today all of the sudden there is this message:
>>
>> *********************************************************************
>> *
>> ******
>> Build Error:
>>
> **********************************************************************
> ******
>> Provider message: The svn command failed.
>> Command output:
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
>> --
>> svn: Working copy '.' locked
>> svn: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' for
> details)
>> Type 'svn help' for usage.
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
>> --
>>
>> Does anyone have any idea how to solve this?
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Erik van Ingen
>>
>>
> 

Mime
View raw message