Return-Path: 
 <continuum-users-return-5070-apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive=maven.apache.org@maven.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 14895 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2007 00:35:00 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2007 00:35:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 58400 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2007 00:34:46 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive@maven.apache.org
Received: (qmail 58373 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2007 00:34:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact continuum-users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:continuum-users-help@maven.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:continuum-users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:continuum-users@maven.apache.org>
List-Id: <continuum-users.maven.apache.org>
Reply-To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Received: (qmail 58362 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2007 00:34:46 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:34:46 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wsmoak@gmail.com designates
 66.249.82.227 as permitted sender)
Received: from [66.249.82.227] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.227)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:34:50 +0000
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so658756wxd
        for <continuum-users@maven.apache.org>;
 Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=lvbonqN/K8KSzL57Tji7RvL4Qijal9S3pDWkwBWv7DU=;
        b=RK3Cv3LcBLs0eTuElGAAr6bjy0bGYo3Y1N22/xJeYU9PgUhsviX+klojxhScdsB6QuZyF0sA27bZi3JaUSGYQPYVfSCy7X4hi67IEIUA4KMutbDUQgnNM9I7N26HtmyFjvQ9U6hO6SzHDgREkqEmOH+NULE5q1ulgmflZLwD+Oo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=JkN3gCduiaXck8DcU4nNAQcQjXqyicTwAdaqT5ye4ATQoS88SX2EdgHDizBe2IFiRZN9osFucWCHHDj7aV6ccdJoTpqCf50jhLdUWO8kW8vUkl2ze8E0AMrYf6LIxLdVG4d7sZNhLwUlyAuoV6IQM8/qn3ECfBZzhbllhlYq3ik=
Received: by 10.90.93.6 with SMTP id q6mr1961658agb.1193358869071;
        Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.90.103.3 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <adba96190710251734v58fad466x7c796d49496e9ba6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:34:29 -0700
From: "Wendy Smoak" <wsmoak@gmail.com>
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: scm in pom?
In-Reply-To: <40c510220710251519h526c7036ve96789bbad3c601b@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <40c510220710251323h5f2a1fccl5f57f565def39e08@mail.gmail.com>
	 <adba96190710251341h377c9409p45a06bea399d9ed7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <40c510220710251519h526c7036ve96789bbad3c601b@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 10/25/07, deckrider <deckrider@gmail.com> wrote:

> Only Continuum uses "<scm><connection></connection></scm>" within
> pom.xml?  Thus if its no longer valid, everything else would still
> work in the case that we needed to rebuild some artifacts from their
> original tags?

It gets used when you generate the website [1], but that and Continuum
are the only things I know of that care about it.   Maybe the scm
plugin uses it?

> This somehow feels non-modular to me that all my projects that I put
> in my SCM should know about the SCM in which they exist (and their
> location within that SCM), but perhaps there is some clue that I'm
> missing.

Well... how often is this really going to be an issue?  There should
be only one SCM of record, and that's the one that belongs in the pom
of projects under active development.

[1] http://myfaces.apache.org/api/source-repository.html

-- 
Wendy