Mailing-List: contact continuum-users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vpetreski@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.198.188 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=QYKZTrYzRVxLz1AXtw3MVwQ4zQYstm0c2bEzL01rawCdm5zDJE6nxr7lO4AYwyEthapHlamwunDnuiFCE0rsIYB+Xf6rAYaCwE/ngDP6cSM9elSjD7ML5F4AUwrQyyKm9EECcCN/oMO5hfNSA0jhOstYRILKeT6sWcFJ+kkzNy4=
Message-ID: <1ccf02660710250536u6d8a771fnd35b00362823681d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:36:28 +0200
From: "Vanja Petreski" <vpetreski@gmail.com>
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: configure build trigger ('after each commit') web-console
In-Reply-To: <472089CE.3040009@venisse.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_550_602549.1193315788477"
References: <13403906.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <1ccf02660710250355i37280898o285e7b8452f9290b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <472089CE.3040009@venisse.net>

------=_Part_550_602549.1193315788477
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 10/25/07, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net> wrote:
>
> OneMin scheduler isn't a good thing if you have lot of projets or big
> projects in Continuum and you consume lot of resources on your continuum
> server and svn server.


Isn't that same as the developer who are doing svn update for every project
every one minute?

Personally, I don't understand why some users need to run a build for each
> commit???


 Isn't that one of the feature of the Continuous Integration? To discover
problems ASAP?


Vanja

------=_Part_550_602549.1193315788477--