Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41328 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2007 14:46:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2007 14:46:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 86618 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2007 14:45:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 86593 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2007 14:45:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact continuum-users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list continuum-users@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 86581 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2007 14:45:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:45:53 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dantran@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.246 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.246] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.246) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:45:55 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d30so484623and for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:45:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=w/QGQZwX2kbWJEeCuvsD3fXxhY1QUln5WWNEzXPgGE4=; b=gPEi/AzBvbnCK8DJbhknqJ6e3vDL6Wojk4F9Nc1i85YIvS5G4qTnL7jwyX0IL6mWC+OsnYwqt6otWd2RgERiuBlnp2YRAZgNGDQSNs157XQmrmGZ37ocLXLKNljGZNu0JlWqpz/SqC7dYy3bvMzYdPLfd7GepNzwUgi6Ign6FD4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fpLL4a6HwVihfzRLMzsBla651RGMtPKInQNKqsruUAjwyR9miWIvI6cZjBjoJE3lCfVhXE16kxjITCt+uf2CaU3lixQl63SStJbrHncjdWxBQOtUuLdfZQcf8LtFsPCT2w4s1tNnNPKa8ABbS6uBOuFI+4wMrrpT/Fpd+CbBArc= Received: by 10.90.96.7 with SMTP id t7mr7385016agb.1191077134473; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:45:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.84.1 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:45:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:45:34 -0700 From: "Dan Tran" To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Get a build when I force but not when I schedule 1.0.3 In-Reply-To: <74C2393513801E43A5A713E6B0BA87AA0193041F@MEMEXCH22V.corp.ds.fedex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <74C2393513801E43A5A713E6B0BA87AA0193041F@MEMEXCH22V.corp.ds.fedex.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have seen this behavior on continuum 1.0.3, but have not confirmed with 1.1 beta. -D On 9/28/07, Alex Boyer wrote: > Hi, > > When I force a build I get a build in failure for a project, which is > what I expect. > > But if I then allow the default_schedule to start scheduling builds > every hour I don't get anymore builds. I get this message: > > NFO BuildController - The project was not built because > there are no changes. > > Well OK. I take it that we don't try a new build even though the > previous broke since nothing changed. > > I deleted a file from the scm repository and waited for the next > scheduled build. > > Same thing. NFO BuildController - The project was not > built because there are no changes. > > Even though I can see where the file was deleted because the scm > changed. > > That doesn't make sense. > > Folder: BeanService (working dir: C:\Program Files\Apache Software > Foundation\continuum-1.0.3\apps\continuum\working-directory\6\src\main\j > ava\BeanService) > > INFO | jvm 1 | 2007/09/28 16:09:04 | AuthResponse.java: deleted > > Then if I force again I see the build error out as expected. > > I must be overlooking something. > > What makes a build kick off if deleting a file that would break a > compile doesn't? > > Thank you, > > Alex Boyer > > > >