Mailing-List: contact continuum-users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <46E5650A.8040100@venisse.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:38:50 +0200
From: Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
References: <fc82b4040709040732g75bcd8f7jd46c992ce480946c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <46DD7D4B.7030807@venisse.net>
 <46DD7E89.4080209@openplans.org>	 <005401c7ef0c$4d998060$3afaa8c0@mrinal>
 <46DD855D.6010102@venisse.net>
 <fc82b4040709100748r20e4a2e3y6bd57bcd31191439@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fc82b4040709100748r20e4a2e3y6bd57bcd31191439@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Continuum can't be compared to Archiva because in Continuum pages we have lot of db queries.

Emmanuel

Damien Lecan a �crit :
> Hello,
> 
> I set up Archiva 1.0-beta-1 with the same configuration, and
> performances are quite better than Continuum one (2-3s to display a
> page).
> 
> How can I understand what happen to my Continuum instance ?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Damien Lecan
> 
> 
> 2007/9/4, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net>:
>> We know that 1.1 is a little slower than 1.0.3 because lot of new request and full security added but 25s for 17 modules isn't a normal perf result
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> Mrinal Mukherjee a �crit :
>>> Same problem with me. Slow UI. I had this problem as soon as I upgraded to
>>> the newer version of continuum. I thought it was a problem in my system, but
>>> now I know its something to do with the new version of continuum.
>>>
>>> Mrinal
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Justin Deoliveira [mailto:jdeolive@openplans.org]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 5:49 PM
>>> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance
>>>
>>> I am using derby out of the box and noticed the same slowdown. I don't
>>> have any metrics to back it up but its definitely noticeably slower.
>>>
>>> -Justin
>>>
>>> Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>> Damien Lecan a �crit :
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just installed Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 to replace my old Continuum
>>>>> 1.0.3 instance.
>>>>> I'm working with MySql instead of embbeded sql server and with Tomcat
>>>>> 5.5.17
>>>>>
>>>>> Nice new features, but UI is very, very, very slow :(
>>>>>
>>>>> I followed
>>>>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+MySQL
>>>>> and http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+Tomcat
>>>>> for installation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Everything works fine, but very, very slowly. For example, each item
>>>>> on the left menu appears one after the other. Same thing when
>>>>> displaying project group information. Each module name  appears one
>>>>> after the other (25s for a 17 modules project).
>>>> 25s for 17 modules??? With embedded derby database we have better
>>>> performance (http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/) and all appears
>>>> at the same time
>>>> Are you sure you use the right jdbc driver?
>>>>
>>>>> MySql database is shared with other Java applications. They work fine,
>>>>> with expected performances.
>>>>>
>>>>> What can be the problem ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Damien Lecan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> !DSPAM:4007,46dd7d79203981439371379!
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
>