Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68170 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2007 03:58:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2007 03:58:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 53969 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2007 03:58:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 53944 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2007 03:58:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact continuum-users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list continuum-users@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 53927 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2007 03:58:21 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:58:21 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [167.219.90.14] (HELO nmp3.deloitte.com) (167.219.90.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:58:16 -0700 Received: from atl1.deloitte.com (atl1.deloitte.com [10.28.30.11]) by nmp3.deloitte.com with ESMTP for continuum-users@maven.apache.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 03:57:56 Z Received: from usndc0481.us.deloitte.com ([10.28.30.181] [10.28.30.181]) by atl1.deloitte.com with ESMTP for continuum-users@maven.apache.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 03:57:56 Z Received: from uscnt0416.us.deloitte.com ([10.26.30.116]) by usndc0481.us.deloitte.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:57:56 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Multiple Continuum instances on a single server Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:57:51 -0500 Message-Id: <265E9EE670ED404DA5DBE42428204A44A45458@uscnt0416.us.deloitte.com> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Multiple Continuum instances on a single server Thread-Index: AcevjFulDMUP8uWyTzqSfq5AfFAL7QAPdntw References: <265E9EE670ED404DA5DBE42428204A44A453A2@uscnt0416.us.deloitte.com> <0EC370DBE07BDE41B49E1CE0971BB08D05918A71@SDGEXEVS01.corp.intuit.net> From: "Morgovsky, Alexander (US - Glen Mills)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2007 03:57:56.0252 (UTC) FILETIME=[8591ADC0:01C7AFCA] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Is it possible to set up multiple Windows services for the multiple Continuum instances? If yes, what file(s) need to be modified so that \bin\win32\InstallService.bat runs correctly? Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Dan Tran [mailto:dantran@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 4:32 PM To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Multiple Continuum instances on a single server and make sure each using its own local repository On 6/15/07, McNaught, Duncan wrote: > > You can have multiple continuum instances on a single server, just > change the port in apps/continuum/conf/application.xml and the paths in > the configuration (you have to start the server to change this) > (http://ci2:8080/continuum/admin/configuration!input.action) > We have 5 instances running on one linux box. > Thanks > --Duncan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Morgovsky, Alexander (US - Glen Mills) > [mailto:amorgovsky@deloitte.com] > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 2:01 PM > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Multiple Continuum instances on a single server > > Is it possible to have multiple Continuum instances on a single server? > Has this set-up been tested and shown to work correctly? Thank you. > > > This message (including any attachments) contains confidential > information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is > protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should > delete this message. > > > Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking > of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. [v.E.1] >