continuum-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Duncan" <stephen.dun...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Multiple modules]
Date Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:28:42 GMT
On 9/25/06, Christian Edward Gruber <cgruber@israfil.net> wrote:
> Yeah.  There's a ticket in the maven JIRA about it, proposing that
> ${parentSCMUrl}/${modulePath} be used instead of
> ${parentSCMUrl}/${artifactId}.  No notion of whether it will be actually
> accepted and implemented.
>
> The proper workaround is to explicitly define SCM urls in each child
> project, as I believe was mentioned earlier, or to make your sub-project
> modules under the parent and make the folder name equal to the artifactId.
>
> This is, however, really problematic for working with maven and eclipse
> simultaneously, as you can't get the full project set, including parent,
> loaded in eclipse, because eclipse cannot support sub-projects nested in
> other projects.
>
> Cheers,
> Christian.

Actually, that works fine in Eclipse 3.2.

-Stephen

> David Roussel wrote:
> > That does seem to be the convention in Maven (it's not a continuum
> > thing), that the modules are most often in subfolders of the parent
> > project, and have folder names the same as the project name.
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:07:01 +0200, "Francois Le Fevre"
> > <flefevre@genoscope.cns.fr> said:
> >
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I have identified my error: it seems that module and parent artifact id
> >> have to match to the folder name when using subversion and continuum!
> >> Could you please confirm the convention?
> >>
> >> Francois
> >>
> >> snip
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> --
>
> *christian** gruber + process coach and architect*
>
> *Israfil Consulting Services Corporation*
>
> *email** cgruber@israfil.net + bus 905.640.1119 + mob 416.998.6023*
>
>
>


-- 
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com

Mime
View raw message