continuum-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Karr, David" <>
Subject Strategies for setting up "enhanced" build of what's in SCM
Date Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:29:30 GMT
I like the way Continuum does all the work of setting up an internal
repository for the local SCM view, so I don't have to define that
externally like I do in CruiseControl.  Ironically, however, I now see a
capability in CruiseControl that I need, that I don't see in Continuum,
mostly because of the "clean" interface it defines to the project and

I have a couple old projects that were not committing any new code to,
which I needed to "enhance" to make an effective build.  For instance, I
wanted to amend the to include things like the build number
that CruiseControl set.  I did this by defining a build.xml outside of
the project that takes parameters, like where the actual project
build.xml is, and changing the deployable artifact file to include an
"environment" name that it will be deployed to, and a couple other

The build definition in Continuum allows me to specify a relative path
to the build.xml, but that's probably not good enough.

View raw message