Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21436 invoked from network); 19 May 2006 13:18:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 May 2006 13:18:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 83707 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2006 13:18:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 83686 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2006 13:18:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact continuum-users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list continuum-users@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 83672 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2006 13:18:05 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 06:18:05 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [62.193.206.9] (HELO webmail9.amenworld.com) (62.193.206.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 06:18:04 -0700 Received: (qmail 12926 invoked from network); 19 May 2006 13:17:48 -0000 Received: from 95.20.99-84.rev.gaoland.net (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (84.99.20.95) by 0 with SMTP; 19 May 2006 13:17:48 -0000 Message-ID: <446DC572.7060703@venisse.net> Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:17:38 +0200 From: Emmanuel Venisse User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: xml-rpc client References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N The xml-rpc part haven't yet access to all methods. Please file an issue and we'll add missing method in next version. Emmanuel Adam Leggett a �crit : > Hi, > > I can add a project using ProjectsReader.addProject but am unable to add > a build definition so pr.buildProject fails. > I tried modifying the ProjectsReader.projectToHashtable method to > include the call to project.getBuildDefinitions() but that didn't work > either. > Does the service endpoint addProject method understand buildDefinitions? > > If anyones interested, as a workaround ive developed a little admin > utility with a CLI that allows you to upload a pom and set a build def > to a running continuum instance. Heres a snippet from my .bat file that > executes it > > set ARGS=-p@project.pom.url@ -hlocalhost:8001 -m@project.artifact@ > -g@project.builddef.goals@ -a@project.builddef.args@ > set > CLASSPATH=./lib/continuum-client-1.0-SNAPSHOT-jar-with-dependencies.jar > java -cp %CLASSPATH% > uk.co.upco.engage.continuum.http.ContinuumProjectAdministrator %ARGS% > > It basically mimics http POST requests made via the continuum 1.0.3 web > console. > > TIA > > Adam > > Adam Leggett > Senior Consultant > UPCO > Direct Line: 0113 20 10 631 > Fax: 0113 20 10 666 > > > > > > =========================================================================== > The contents of this email are intended for the named addresses and may > contain confidential and/or privileged material. If received in error, > please contact UPCO head office on +44(0)113 201 0600 and then delete > the entire mail from your system. Unauthorised review, distribution, > disclosure or other use of information could constitute a breach of > confidence. Your co-operation in this matter is greatly appreciated. > > Every effort has been taken to ensure that this email and any > attachments are virus-free. However, UPCO does not make any warranty > to this effect, and is not liable for any damage done by an infected > email message or attachment. UPCO recommends that all emails and > attachments are checked before opening. > > All views or opinions expressed in this electronic message and its > attachements are those of the sender and do not necessarily reflect > the views and opinions of The Ultimate People Company Ltd. > =========================================================================== > > > > >