From continuum-users-return-1782-apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive=maven.apache.org@maven.apache.org Wed May 31 08:33:42 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22100 invoked from network); 31 May 2006 08:33:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 May 2006 08:33:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 19811 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2006 08:33:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-users-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 19542 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2006 08:33:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact continuum-users-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list continuum-users@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 19519 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2006 08:33:41 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 May 2006 01:33:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [62.193.206.9] (HELO webmail9.amenworld.com) (62.193.206.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 31 May 2006 01:33:40 -0700 Received: (qmail 10850 invoked from network); 31 May 2006 08:33:20 -0000 Received: from 65.29.98-84.rev.gaoland.net (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (84.98.29.65) by 0 with SMTP; 31 May 2006 08:33:20 -0000 Message-ID: <447D54C7.4030402@venisse.net> Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:33:11 +0200 From: Emmanuel Venisse User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: building twice - version 1.0.3 References: <053020061731.17319.447C8175000D082E000043A722070245530A040A0A9B9CD2089C0106@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <053020061731.17319.447C8175000D082E000043A722070245530A040A0A9B9CD2089C0106@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Do you have 2 build definitions on your project? Emmanuel josh.steele@comcast.net a écrit : > Hi all, > Thanks for the responses. I actually avoid using "refresh" to keep this from happening - I instead, as you mentioned, click the Show Proejcts link to get an update on the status. However, this isn't my problem. > > Even from a freshly setup continuum project, if I click on the "Build Now" icon, continuum builds 2 builds, one after the other. For this example, I'm simply running "java:compile" (I'm using M1.1-beta2), and in the first build, it prepares the filesystem, and compiles the files (takes in total 10 seconds). The second build right after that only takes 2 seconds to complete, since no changes have taken place, so it essentially does nothing. > > > Looking at the console output for Continuum, there seems to be 2 "enqueings" of the project from the moment I hit the build now button. I do nothing from the time I press the button until the console stops generating output. > > Any thoughts for this? > > Thanks, > Josh > > > > -----Original Message------- > Yes, actually, if you refresh a page generated just after a form, the form is resended when > you > refresh the page. You can click on Show Project link in menu instead. > > We'll fix this problem in 1.1 > > Emmanuel > > Rick Riemer a �crit : > >>Joshua, >> >>I've seen the same thing recently. In my case what happened is that I >>refreshed the status page to see if the build was actually started, but with >>doing that I was giving another command to start a build. >> >>Once I stopped refreshing no more builds happened. >> >>Rick >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Joshua Steele [mailto:josh.steele@comcast.net] >>Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:35 >>To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org >>Subject: building twice - version 1.0.3 >> >>All, >> I'm having an issue with Continuum 1.0.3 where it is building a >>project twice, one immediately after the other. I've scanned JIRA >>and can't find a report. Is this something that is known? Any >>details are appreciated. >> >>Thanks, >>Josh >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > >