continuum-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lee Meador" <...@leemeador.com>
Subject Re: update in continuum
Date Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:05:53 GMT
Maybe I'm missing something but if you are going to "deliberately provide"
some code, why not just build it as soon as you do that?

On 3/31/06, graham@biomedcentral.com <graham@biomedcentral.com> wrote:
>
>
> I suspect the use case is similar to our own situation - we have an SCM
> package that is not directly supported by Maven / Continuum, and therefore
> we get the SCM server to shadow the code to the build server, with Continuum
> configured to run against the shadowed code.
>
> The workaround is to define your scm entry as scm:local, pointing it to
> the shadowed files. Even if the use case is different (and the SCM is
> directly supported), you could still use this technique to stop Continuum
> from pulling files from an SCM, and just use the code that you deliberately
> provide in the file system.
>
> The downside would be if you need the SCM setting to actually reflect your
> SCM package (ie. to be displayed on the site generation).
>
> G
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:emmanuel@venisse.net]
> Sent: 30 March 2006 20:42
> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Re: update in continuum
>
>
> No, and i don't see what is the use case.
> Why do you want to run several times maven goals on the same code base?
>
> Emmanuel
>
> raghurajan.x.gurunathan@jpmchase.com a écrit :
> > Is that possible in continuum to configure it so that it wont actually
> > update the source, instead just run the maven goals??
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raghu
> >
>
> This email has been scanned by Postini.
> For more information please visit http://www.postini.com
>
>


--
-- Lee Meador
Sent from gmail. My real email address is lee@leemeador.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message