continuum-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kaare Nilsen" <kaare.nil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re: Re: RE : Re: RE : Continuum 1.0.3 RC require some tester
Date Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:15:46 GMT
And sometimes the index page shows that builds have failed, but when
you look at the actual build results, it is fine

On 30/03/06, Kaare Nilsen <kaare.nilsen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also there is an annoying memory leak. i need to restart continumm
> each second or third day :(
>
> On 27/03/06, Kaare Nilsen <kaare.nilsen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi been using the RC SNAPSHOT, and i do not feel it is ready for
> > production yet. To often when i look in the list something has been
> > broken, not of problems in the app that is being build, but in the
> > continuum itself. here is the latest one.
> >
> > problem with the 1.0.3 RC Snapshot :
> > javax.jdo.JDODataStoreException: Transaction failed to commit
> >         at org.jpox.NonmanagedTransaction.rollback(NonmanagedTransaction.java:558)
> >         at org.apache.maven.continuum.store.JdoContinuumStore.rollback(JdoContinuumStore.java:577)
> >         at org.apache.maven.continuum.store.JdoContinuumStore.addBuildResult(JdoContinuumStore.java:260)
> >         at org.apache.maven.continuum.buildcontroller.DefaultBuildController.makeAndStoreBuildResult(DefaultBuildController.java:434)
> >         at org.apache.maven.continuum.buildcontroller.DefaultBuildController.build(DefaultBuildController.java:177)
> >         at org.apache.maven.continuum.buildcontroller.BuildProjectTaskExecutor.executeTask(BuildProjectTaskExecutor.java:53)
> >         at org.codehaus.plexus.taskqueue.execution.ThreadedTaskQueueExecutor$ExecutorRunnable.run(ThreadedTaskQueueExecutor.java:103)
> >         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
> > NestedThrowablesStackTrace:
> > SQL Exception: No current connection.
> >         at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown Source)
> >         at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.newEmbedSQLException(Unknown Source)
> >         at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.Util.noCurrentConnection(Unknown Source)
> >         at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.setupContextStack(Unknown
Source)
> >         at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedConnection.rollback(Unknown Source)
> >         at org.jpox.NonmanagedTransaction.rollback(NonmanagedTransaction.java:535)
> >         at org.apache.maven.continuum.store.JdoContinuumStore.rollback(JdoContinuumStore.java:577)
> >         at org.apache.maven.continuum.store.JdoContinuumStore.addBuildResult(JdoContinuumStore.java:260)
> >         at org.apache.maven.continuum.buildcontroller.DefaultBuildController.makeAndStoreBuildResult(DefaultBuildController.java:434)
> >         at org.apache.maven.continuum.buildcontroller.DefaultBuildController.build(DefaultBuildController.java:177)
> >         at org.apache.maven.continuum.buildcontroller.BuildProjectTaskExecutor.executeTask(BuildProjectTaskExecutor.java:53)
> >         at org.codehaus.plexus.taskqueue.execution.ThreadedTaskQueueExecutor$ExecutorRunnable.run(ThreadedTaskQueueExecutor.java:103)
> >         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
> >
> > On 24/03/06, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Yann Le Du a écrit :
> > > > Done, CONTINUUM-637 and CONTINUUM-638
> > > >
> > > > Actually, CONTINUUM-638 only happens with parent/module - not with
> > > > dependency.
> > >
> > > I'll look at it later.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > BTW, I had a question about migration to 1.0.3. Can we keep old
> > > > build-output-directory and working-directory or do we have to re-create
them
> > > > from scratch ? I believe you wrote about a migration tool, but I can't
find
> > > > the thread anymore...
> > >
> > > It isn't a tool. I'll write migration documentation in few days. You can keep
build-output-directory
> > > and working-directory if you configure continuum to use them.
> > > You can keep too the database if you copy old database un der $NEW_CONTINUUM/apps/continuum/
> > >
> > > Emmanuel
> > > >
> > > > On 3/24/06, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>Yann Le Du a écrit :
> > > >>
> > > >>>Hi Emmanuel,
> > > >>>
> > > >>>I just tried 20060324.020000 and my problem about 2 build definitions
> > > >>
> > > >>with
> > > >>
> > > >>>the same schedule is seemlingly still happening. But now, only
the
> > > >>
> > > >>*first*
> > > >>
> > > >>>definition is executed.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>You can try with this simple example :
> > > >>>Definition 1 : clean site-deploy - DEFAULT_SCHEDULE
> > > >>>Definition 2 : clean install - DEFAULT_SCHEDULE (default buld
> > > >>
> > > >>definition)
> > > >>
> > > >>>Only Definition 1 is executed.
> > > >>
> > > >>You're right, the second is launched but without changes, it doesn't
run
> > > >>the build. I'll look at it
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>I also noticed antoher thing. You have projects A and B in Continuum.
B
> > > >>>depends on A (in my case, A is the parent of B). B has a build
> > > >>
> > > >>definition
> > > >>
> > > >>>for a given schedule, but A has *no* build definition for this
schedule.
> > > >>>Then B build won't be executed, probably because it waits for A
> > > >>
> > > >>execution
> > > >>
> > > >>>first - which won't happen.
> > > >>
> > > >>hmm, strange. I'll look at it.
> > > >>
> > > >>Can you file two issues for these problems (with 1.0.3 fixed version)?
> > > >>
> > > >>Emmanuel
> > > >>
> > > >>>Don't hesitate if you need more details.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>On 3/24/06, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>I have this error only when i shutdown continuum. I fixed it.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Emmanuel
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>Not reproduce (strange ?).
> > > >>>>>Sorry for noise.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>- Olivier
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>-----Message d'origine-----
> > > >>>>>De : Olivier Lamy [mailto:olivier.lamy@accor.com]
> > > >>>>>Envoyé : vendredi 24 mars 2006 10:26
> > > >>>>>À : 'continuum-users@maven.apache.org'
> > > >>>>>Objet : RE : Re: RE : Continuum 1.0.3 RC require some tester
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>Hi,
> > > >>>>>Thanks emmanuel.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>Note the env :
> > > >>>>>- solaris : uname -a >  5.9 Generic_118558-13 sun4u
sparc
> > > >>>>>SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240
> > > >>>>>- JAVA_HOME -> j2sdk1.4.2_04
> > > >>>>>- using $CONTINUUM/bin/plexus.sh (not using wrapper)
> > > >>>>>- snapshot 20060317.073000
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>I will try today to reproduce it (I need to way the next
schedule 11H00
> > > >>>>>Paris Time, suspens ;-) )
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>- Olivier
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>-----Message d'origine-----
> > > >>>>>De : Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:emmanuel@venisse.net]
> > > >>>>>Envoyé : vendredi 24 mars 2006 00:10
> > > >>>>>À : continuum-users@maven.apache.org
> > > >>>>>Objet : Re: Re: RE : Continuum 1.0.3 RC require some tester
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>Yann, it's fixed now, all build definitions on the same
schedule are
> > > >>>>>executed.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>Olivier, I can't reproduce your problem.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>Emmanuel
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>Yann Le Du a écrit :
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>Everything is working fine for me, especially
> > > >>>>>>http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-577
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>I fail to reproduce Olivier's problem, either with
20060316.173001 or
> > > >>>>>>20060317.073000 . Only one of both definitions is executed
(the last
> > > >>>>>>one in the list), but Continuum doesn't stop.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>Big thanks for this new version !
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>- Yann
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>On 3/20/06, Olivier Lamy <olivier.lamy@accor.com>
wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>In fact not so good.
> > > >>>>>>>Log :
> > > >>>>>>>2006-03-18 09:40:52,260 [Thread-7] ERROR
> > > >>>>>>>org.codehaus.plexus.summit.pull.PullService  -
Problem disp osing
> > > >>>>>>>global tools: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
> > > >>>>>>>     at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextEntry
(HashMap.java:782)
> > > >>>>>>>     at java.util.HashMap$KeyIterator.next(HashMap.java:818)
> > > >>>>>>>     at
> > > >>>>>>>org.codehaus.plexus.summit.pull.DefaultPullService.disposeGlobalTools
> > > >>
> > > >>(
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>De
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>fault
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>This stop continuum.
> > > >>>>>>>Simple test with two build definition on the same
project and with
> > > >>
> > > >>the
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>>>same schedule (I know not a normal use case ;-)
but it failed).
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>Snapshot : continuum-20060317.073000
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>- Olivier
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>-----Message d'origine-----
> > > >>>>>>>De : Olivier Lamy [mailto: olivier.lamy@accor.com]
> > > >>>>>>>Envoyé : vendredi 17 mars 2006 17:20
> > > >>>>>>>À : 'continuum-users@maven.apache.org'
> > > >>>>>>>Objet : RE : Continuum 1.0.3 RC require some tester
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>Hi,
> > > >>>>>>>I have made some tests and it looks ok.
> > > >>>>>>>Especially the issue concerning reading $HOME/.m2/settings.xml
> > > >>>>>>>(http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-590
)
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>Good job.
> > > >>>>>>>You don't have to wait maven 2.0.3 release ?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>- Olivier
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>PS : I'm not an orange fan but no problem ;-)
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>-----Message d'origine-----
> > > >>>>>>>De : Emmanuel Venisse [mailto: emmanuel@venisse.net]
> > > >>>>>>>Envoyé : jeudi 16 mars 2006 22:33
> > > >>>>>>>À : continuum-users@maven.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>Objet : Continuum 1.0.3 RC require some tester
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>Hi,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>I think it's time to release Continuum 1.0.3. This
release will
> > > >>>>>>>incorporate 65 issues, including some critical
fixes. The full
> > > >>
> > > >>listing
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>of fixes can be found here:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&style
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>>>Na
> > > >>>>>>>me=Html&version=12330
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>If you're interested, you can take the current
release candidate for
> > > >>
> > > >>a
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>>>test drive. The RC tarball is at:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/builds/branches/continuum-1.0
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>>>.x<
> > > >>
> > > >>http://maven.zones.apache.org/%7Econtinuum/builds/branches/continuu
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>>>m-1.0.x>
> > > >>>>>>>/continuum-20060316.173001.tar.gz
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>Cheers,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>Emmanuel
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>This e-mail, any attachments and the information
contained therein
> > > >>>>>>>("this
> > > >>>>>>>message") are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the
> > > >>>>>>>addressee(s). If you have received this message
in error please send
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>it back
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>to the sender and delete it. Unauthorized publication,
use,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>dissemination or
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>disclosure of this message, either in whole or
in part is strictly
> > > >>>>>>>prohibited.
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>>>**********************************************************************
> > > >>>>>>>Ce message électronique et tous les fichiers joints
ainsi que  les
> > > >>>>>>>informations contenues dans ce message ( ci après
"le message" ),
> > > >>
> > > >>sont
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>>>confidentiels et destinés exclusivement à l'usage
de la  personne à
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>laquelle
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>ils sont adressés. Si vous avez reçu ce message
par erreur, merci  de
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>le
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>renvoyer à son émetteur et de le détruire. Toutes
diffusion,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>publication,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>totale ou partielle ou divulgation sous quelque
forme que se soit non
> > > >>>>>>>expressément autorisées de ce message, sont interdites.
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>>>**********************************************************************
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>This e-mail, any attachments and the information contained
therein
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>("this message") are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the
> > > >>>>addressee(s). If you have received this message in error please
send it
> > > >>
> > > >>back
> > > >>
> > > >>>>to the sender and delete it. Unauthorized publication, use,
> > > >>
> > > >>dissemination or
> > > >>
> > > >>>>disclosure of this message, either in whole or in part is strictly
> > > >>>>prohibited.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>Ce message électronique et tous les fichiers joints ainsi
que  les
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>informations contenues dans ce message ( ci après "le message"
), sont
> > > >>>>confidentiels et destinés exclusivement à l'usage de la 
personne à
> > > >>
> > > >>laquelle
> > > >>
> > > >>>>ils sont adressés. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur,
merci  de le
> > > >>>>renvoyer à son émetteur et de le détruire. Toutes diffusion,
> > > >>
> > > >>publication,
> > > >>
> > > >>>>totale ou partielle ou divulgation sous quelque forme que se
soit non
> > > >>>>expressément autorisées de ce message, sont interdites.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message