continuum-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Johnson, Jonathan" <jjohn...@454.com>
Subject RE: Re: Why Continuum?
Date Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:34:55 GMT
This is a good doc.  Thanks.  I don't think its entirely accurate
though.  For instance Continuum does not have the feature yet to invoke
builds based on SCM changes.  It is strictly a time based configuration.
This document indicates differently.  Its also says that CruiseControl
does not support M2.  Not sure if that is accurate now/still.  It's a
helpful and ambitious document, but is it being maintaining for accuracy
over time?

>> Continuum / M2 tighter integration

My comment here is not based on fact, just an observation that the
people behind these scenes of M2 and Continuum project a sense they are
all pointing in the same, metaphorical direction.





-----Original Message-----
From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Herscu
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 3:55 PM
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why Continuum?

Jonathan, thanks for your fast reply.
Finally, I have found a comparison here:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DAMAGECONTROL/Continuous+Integration+Se
rver+Feature+Matrix
But, still I do not understand what is the "tighter integration with
Maven 2" all about. Using CC I still can invoke Maven (1 or 2 -- does it
matter?) through the shell interface -- isn't it?

Johnson, Jonathan wrote:
> If you are looking for a richer feature set stick with CruiseControl.

> 
> Continuum is still relatively new and many features you have
> CruiseControl are not yet available in Continuum.  
> 
> I chose to try Continuum because of my simple build requirements which
> will grow hopefully with the Continuum and Maven 2 feature sets.  In
> addition I opted for Continuums tighter integration with Maven 2.
> 
> If the feature sets were the same I would recommend Continuum because
of
> it tighter integration with Maven 2.
> 
> Many of the feature you might expect to find in Continuum are really
in
> Maven 2 (where they should be, well.. at least when they are written
as
> a plugin for Maven 2).  Be careful of comparing the apples to oranges.
> Be aware that Maven 2 and Continuum have only been around for a few
> months and more features are anticipated this year.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Herscu
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 2:59 PM
> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Why Continuum?
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I am trying to find the answer to this question with no success.
> Currently, I am using CruiseControl -- why should I (or others like
me)
> switch to Continuum?
> 
> Adrian.
> 
> 
> LEGAL NOTICE:
> Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and
may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to
this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee,
any disclosure or copying of the contents or any action taken (or not
taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are
not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message