continuum-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Johnson, Jonathan" <jjohn...@454.com>
Subject RE: Why Continuum?
Date Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:25:56 GMT
If you are looking for a richer feature set stick with CruiseControl.  

Continuum is still relatively new and many features you have
CruiseControl are not yet available in Continuum.  

I chose to try Continuum because of my simple build requirements which
will grow hopefully with the Continuum and Maven 2 feature sets.  In
addition I opted for Continuums tighter integration with Maven 2.

If the feature sets were the same I would recommend Continuum because of
it tighter integration with Maven 2.

Many of the feature you might expect to find in Continuum are really in
Maven 2 (where they should be, well.. at least when they are written as
a plugin for Maven 2).  Be careful of comparing the apples to oranges.
Be aware that Maven 2 and Continuum have only been around for a few
months and more features are anticipated this year.




-----Original Message-----
From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Herscu
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 2:59 PM
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Why Continuum?

Hi all,

I am trying to find the answer to this question with no success.
Currently, I am using CruiseControl -- why should I (or others like me)
switch to Continuum?

Adrian.


LEGAL NOTICE:
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It
is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents or any action taken
(or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee,
please inform the sender immediately.



Mime
View raw message