continuum-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthew Vanbiervliet" <mvbv.devli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: continuum scheduled "forced" build
Date Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:37:30 GMT
Ok thank you.
And how will we be able to activate it ? Will it be a new option to check ?
A new argument ?


On 2/22/06, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net> wrote:
>
> I fixed this problem in svn but i need to do some more tests before the
> release of Continuum 1.0.3
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Matthew Vanbiervliet a écrit :
> > I've just seen that there was an open issue about this...
> > Anyway, your suggestions are welcome :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/22/06, Matthew Vanbiervliet <mvbv.devlists@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Is there a way to force Continuum to build a project even if there are
> no
> >>changes in the source repository ?
> >>What I try to achieve is to have Continuum build a snapshot using a
> >>different profile every night, even if there were no changes. I have two
> >>schedules attached to the project :
> >>
> >>- The default one which runs every hour
> >>- A second one that runs at 1 AM every night.
> >>
> >>Now the problem is that, when I commit changes, let's say at 7:35 PM,
> the
> >>scheduled build at 8 pm will detect these changes and perform a build.
> >>At 1 AM, a cvs update is run, but no changes are detected since there
> >>weren't any new commits since 7:35 PM...
> >>
> >>I'd like to have this specific build, build a snapshot and deploy it on
> >>our private repository, so that we always have a latest snapshot
> deployed
> >>every day (and an up to date doc).
> >>To be able to achieve this, the second schedule should start a "forced"
> >>build...(using a argument ? )
> >>
> >>A workaround would be to have the project twice in continuum, one copy
> >>with the default schedule and one copy with the second schedule, but i'd
> >>prefere to avoid this overhead...It still has an advantage though : if
> no
> >>changes were made at all one day, then there wouldn't be an unnecessary
> >>deployment the next night.
> >>
> >>Do you see how I can do that ? Or any better suggestion ?
> >>
> >>
> >>Thanks for your help
> >>
> >>--
> >>Matthew Vanbiervliet
> >>Accelior Consulting
> >>http://www.accelior.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Vanbiervliet
> > Accelior Consulting
> > http://www.accelior.com
> >
>
>


--
Matthew Vanbiervliet
Accelior Consulting
http://www.accelior.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message