Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Sender: Brett Porter <brett@porterclan.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Subject: Re: Looking for testing on the Struts upgrade
From: Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALyHw0H6TLXSvPgfqd-7bXFnvv42nKggiBEPRyo_5PDrSrDN0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 01:19:27 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5942C279-D8C0-44AD-871C-037142F0A5F9@apache.org>
References: <914AF167-B01E-4F31-94D2-5D810E5A764E@apache.org>
 <CALyHw0H6TLXSvPgfqd-7bXFnvv42nKggiBEPRyo_5PDrSrDN0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@continuum.apache.org


On 21 May 2014, at 12:46 am, Brent Atkinson <brent.atkinson@gmail.com> =
wrote:

> Brett,
>=20
> Thank you. I have cycles to test it. Recommendations on approach for
> verifying outside of building and running web tests? I will start
> immediately.
>=20

The web tests should be ok, in this case the best thing is to play with =
it ad-hoc, particularly if you have your own data or typical operations, =
to see if there is anything not working not covered by the tests. Also, =
check for bad layout, which the web tests won't pick up.

- Brett