continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [redback-dev] folding Redback into Archiva or Continuum?
Date Fri, 03 Dec 2010 15:03:44 GMT
Yes, it makes sense to host it under Archiva or Continuum but we need to
keep attention on circular dependencies.

Actually, Continuum uses some Archiva artifacts so if Redback is hosted by
Continuum and used by Archiva, we'll have this graph:

Archiva --> Continuum (Redback) --> Archiva

So, I think it must be an independant project (even under Archiva or
Continuum) with its own release process.

My 2 cents,
Emmanuel

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:

> (Apologies for cross-posting - replies are best sent back to dev@redback,
> unless it's specific to one of the other projects).
>
> After initial attempts to gain external interest, some time has elapsed and
> it seems obvious that Redback hasn't been used outside of Continuum and
> Archiva. Further, it is unlikely to grow in the way they use it. I'm not
> sure it makes sense to remain as a standalone project, and it appeals to me
> to have all of the code under Apache. Less lists to subscribe to and more
> consolidated activity makes sense to me too.
>
> It's also true that moving doesn't buy much immediate benefit other than
> consolidation, so maybe it is fine where it is :)
>
> If it were to move, as it's unlikely to establish it's own community, I
> don't think incubation would make sense. Instead, after clearing the IP, I
> would suggest a subproject of either Continuum or Archiva. In terms of
> committer overlap, the larger overlap of distinct committers is with
> Continuum (Marica and Olivier) vs Archiva (James), with Marica being the
> most recently active.
>
> Given that, I would think a subproject of Continuum makes sense - but that
> we should agree that all Archiva committers should have commit access to it
> and a binding vote on any releases. Does anyone feel strongly it should be
> the other way around?
>
> What do others think? If it's worth doing I will call a formal vote.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message