Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50631 invoked from network); 18 May 2010 13:11:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 May 2010 13:11:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 30755 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2010 13:11:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 30685 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2010 13:11:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 30677 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2010 13:11:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 May 2010 13:11:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wsmoak@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.189] (HELO mail-pz0-f189.google.com) (209.85.222.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 May 2010 13:11:04 +0000 Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so4349901pzk.2 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 06:10:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=3uqz7QrJpEiWSdwSPdqJcwVZwIhvjM4iEBjHQQ4ONiw=; b=on004aZK8+FOZ5iEWBEPigRConC2oO+6cxBe3IgDJq8H1X6z22Gi/2sO1+8YQtUAEK tTqomO7Ljlo/gWrcCXChk8RNI90qhEp+SusU8wMoP3Tm9tp3/0kLDcO0DAyLbcKF6f5u Qbzb3mW0ELI77Oc9wQhVp8ok8eGxtf8LfXyVg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=MvFaQirrhAptbFec6/0tVXzEks4AUQVTQ0bS/AsZ3k3xiCCDPxiG7K6VsPi6GvROcL hyXFmzh0fRKCjtVvair58WGG4LiWSvjaZ3Fa1qfFeijShyJMgc+03/AwfJCkK4hDS3G+ pPm62pX3BOO+LKWP+5gK9c1HHX+gboRkGLKoQ= Received: by 10.142.10.3 with SMTP id 3mr4719128wfj.120.1274188183195; Tue, 18 May 2010 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.161.16 with HTTP; Tue, 18 May 2010 06:09:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Wendy Smoak Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 09:09:23 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Merge branch for flat multi-module support to trunk To: dev@continuum.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Deng Ching wrote: > If you want to give try it out, I deployed a fresh snapshot of the binaries > built from the branch (-r945455) at: > > http://people.apache.org/~oching/continuum-flat-multi-module/ > > The changes in the docs that I made for the flat multi-module support are in > the following pages: > > http://people.apache.org/~oching/continuum-flat-multi-module-docs/user_guides/managing_project/addProject.html > http://people.apache.org/~oching/continuum-flat-multi-module-docs/user_guides/release/index.html I think the two checkboxes are confusing, especially since the docs say that if both are checked, one will be ignored. "Two checkboxes" is not the right UI element for that behavior. Am I reading Emmanuel's comments correctly that you will change the way Continuum works by default to always check a multi-module project out in a single directory? How will that change the UI? (If merging makes it easier to work on I have no objection, but I would like to see it simplified before it gets into a release...) -- Wendy