continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Deng Ching <och...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.6
Date Thu, 01 Apr 2010 02:23:49 GMT
Yes Brett :)

-Deng

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:

> Deng, are you handling the GA vote since you did the release?
>
> (And are we agreed to do it as part of the vote in future?)
>
> On 15/03/2010, at 2:51 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> >
> > On 15/03/2010, at 10:34 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Deng Ching <oching@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> Should we label 1.3.6 as a Beta release?
> >>
> >> Brett suggested having a separate quality vote?  I think in the past
> >> we've just voted once for release and quality.
> >
> > I actually prefer it be part of the vote thread itself, or a discussion
> before the vote starts - that was just a suggestion since it came up in the
> middle of the thread and I didn't want to interrupt it.
> >
> >>
> >> I'm fine with calling it GA and will vote +1 (with reservations).  The
> >> issues that are bothering me are really too big to change on the
> >> branch anyway, they're going to require model changes.
> >
> > Yep, that's was my understanding as well that got captured in the roadmap
> page.
> >
> >>
> >> One option, since it's already been announced as Beta, is to leave it
> >> in the wild for a week or so and if no major issues are reported
> >> against it we can vote it up to GA quality.
> >
> > That's fine with me too...
> >
> >>
> >> We really, really, need to get rid of the branch.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > - Brett
> >
> > --
> > Brett Porter
> > brett@apache.org
> > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message