From dev-return-8699-apmail-continuum-dev-archive=continuum.apache.org@continuum.apache.org Mon Mar 15 03:52:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36929 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2010 03:52:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Mar 2010 03:52:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 56947 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2010 03:51:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 56800 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2010 03:51:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 56791 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2010 03:51:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:51:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.201] (HELO mail-pz0-f201.google.com) (209.85.222.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:51:33 +0000 Received: by pzk39 with SMTP id 39so1603889pzk.15 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.61.12 with SMTP id o12mr4918339wak.195.1268625070866; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:51:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.10] (CPE-121-217-33-148.lnse1.cht.bigpond.net.au [121.217.33.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm5287423pzk.0.2010.03.14.20.51.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:51:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Brett Porter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.6 From: Brett Porter In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:51:06 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8667b1bd1003070922x65e6ce16u294e453f915d5fc7@mail.gmail.com> <8667b1bd1003121625y4b09768dh588ebbb6848da43@mail.gmail.com> To: dev@continuum.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 15/03/2010, at 10:34 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Deng Ching wrote: >> Should we label 1.3.6 as a Beta release? >=20 > Brett suggested having a separate quality vote? I think in the past > we've just voted once for release and quality. I actually prefer it be part of the vote thread itself, or a discussion = before the vote starts - that was just a suggestion since it came up in = the middle of the thread and I didn't want to interrupt it. >=20 > I'm fine with calling it GA and will vote +1 (with reservations). The > issues that are bothering me are really too big to change on the > branch anyway, they're going to require model changes. Yep, that's was my understanding as well that got captured in the = roadmap page. >=20 > One option, since it's already been announced as Beta, is to leave it > in the wild for a week or so and if no major issues are reported > against it we can vote it up to GA quality. That's fine with me too... >=20 > We really, really, need to get rid of the branch. +1 - Brett -- Brett Porter brett@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/