From dev-return-8691-apmail-continuum-dev-archive=continuum.apache.org@continuum.apache.org Sat Mar 13 00:26:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62329 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2010 00:26:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Mar 2010 00:26:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 84773 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 00:26:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 84740 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 00:26:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 84732 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2010 00:26:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:26:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of odeaching@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.201] (HELO mail-px0-f201.google.com) (209.85.216.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:26:14 +0000 Received: by pxi39 with SMTP id 39so1101330pxi.2 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:25:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=IlJxc55Trt7CjJwuRHjTIL41A8TtsiRW0VArxo2Dgw0=; b=c437516Jg/zysiDb+uWZM2UbVpsUfSuBQvb4wepEfXHx9Ndqv+HqPmnMrBLmHCAlSE n0eW68YEUfKdASS8FMyODz/RPuN4H5XDlDLRQaHzsNXTw1yh3+BTWUxsQOs8MEx3G0ZF lyc0VyIoBwsS66KQNYtYkdLMAav2yDT8MuhZo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ki4Fh5zvrujZgHByKo1Z1/iTmjhn3Hjygwo0UQiP6eZoulpx3LPAcXYomUrhvpeuxX GaP43PKScPrAfxyc844j9aboWQSVMjqF892ATN+zcEVYfmlC1igPOi6g47wN+e5v/mfy eRDjvtJTtPaxdFwK3Erk9/K8sk41AwTPUK4SY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: odeaching@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.99.20 with SMTP id w20mr489376wab.128.1268439953506; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:25:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8667b1bd1003070922x65e6ce16u294e453f915d5fc7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:25:53 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1652c2e8bfb7fcaa Message-ID: <8667b1bd1003121625y4b09768dh588ebbb6848da43@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.6 From: Deng Ching To: dev@continuum.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b14bddd90a1e0481a3b09d --001636b14bddd90a1e0481a3b09d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Deng Ching wrote: > > The Continuum 1.3.6 release candidate has been staged. > > This release includes 16 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes > > here: > > +1 to release it, it's working fine for me. I downloaded all the > distribution binaries and checked signatures, then expanded the > tarball on OS X and gave the default config a run through and set up > distributed build with two agents, which also worked. > > We need to decide on the quality. > > While I very much want to get 1.3.x over with and I _am_ using it in > production, there are still some issues that I would not be thrilled > to see in a GA release (mainly in distributed build). :/ What do > others think? > I agree, there are a number of bugs in distributed builds which I think needs to be fixed for a GA release like the problem where some builds are being built in the wrong agent.. Should we label 1.3.6 as a Beta release? Thanks, Deng --001636b14bddd90a1e0481a3b09d--