continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.6
Date Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:29:10 GMT
Deng, are you handling the GA vote since you did the release?

(And are we agreed to do it as part of the vote in future?)

On 15/03/2010, at 2:51 PM, Brett Porter wrote:

> 
> On 15/03/2010, at 10:34 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Deng Ching <oching@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Should we label 1.3.6 as a Beta release?
>> 
>> Brett suggested having a separate quality vote?  I think in the past
>> we've just voted once for release and quality.
> 
> I actually prefer it be part of the vote thread itself, or a discussion before the vote
starts - that was just a suggestion since it came up in the middle of the thread and I didn't
want to interrupt it.
> 
>> 
>> I'm fine with calling it GA and will vote +1 (with reservations).  The
>> issues that are bothering me are really too big to change on the
>> branch anyway, they're going to require model changes.
> 
> Yep, that's was my understanding as well that got captured in the roadmap page.
> 
>> 
>> One option, since it's already been announced as Beta, is to leave it
>> in the wild for a week or so and if no major issues are reported
>> against it we can vote it up to GA quality.
> 
> That's fine with me too...
> 
>> 
>> We really, really, need to get rid of the branch.
> 
> +1
> 
> - Brett
> 
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/





Mime
View raw message