Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 5198 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2010 03:19:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2010 03:19:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 49049 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2010 03:19:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 48937 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2010 03:19:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 48927 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2010 03:19:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:19:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.51] (HELO mail-pw0-f51.google.com) (209.85.160.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:19:14 +0000 Received: by pwj15 with SMTP id 15so1145390pwj.10 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:18:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.215.36 with SMTP id n36mr781503wag.217.1263179933417; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:18:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.0.10? (CPE-58-166-68-133.lnse5.cht.bigpond.net.au [58.166.68.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm20893477pzk.1.2010.01.10.19.18.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:18:52 -0800 (PST) Sender: Brett Porter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: Any plans? From: Brett Porter In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:18:47 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: dev@continuum.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Looking at the remaining issues, I think 2338 will take some longer = investigation, so we may just want to start a 1.3.6 for that. The other two don't look like release blockers, unless they are = regressions? Let's just ship it already :) - Brett On 07/01/2010, at 9:35 AM, Marica Tan wrote: > I'm planning to release a 1.3.5 hopefully by end of next week so I'm = working > on the remaining issues scheduled for that. >=20 > -- > Marica >=20 > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: >=20 >> It's too quiet around here. Is anyone working on anything >> interesting? What about a 1.3.5 or 1.4.0 release? >>=20 >> -- >> Wendy >>=20 -- Brett Porter brett@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/